Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

Offense by lack of creation of files, since the Town Council recorded images picked up through a system of videovigilància, without the authorization of general disposal published in the corresponding Official Bulletin. Offense of the duty of information related, on the one hand, with the lack of informative poster in some of the dependences where there are installed cameras; and on the other hand not to complement the information facilitated in the informative posters in those cases in which yes these have settled, in accordance with what orders the Instruction 1/2009 Articles applied: 44.3.a), 44.2.c), 5, and 20 of the LOPD; 52 of the RLOPD; 9 and 12 of the Instruction 1/2009

It is resolved to stay the procedure since the Town Council had a file that gave coverage to the data processing personal registered of the denouncer. In the previous information the Town Council was required to such effect, without specifying the existence of any file. Applied articles: 20 Decree 278/1993

This protection for the law of cancellation is taken back to law of opposition. The claim of protection loves upward opposition from a formal optics not to solve the request in the deadline of 10 days, and also as for the background, since they have gone by abundantly the deadlines of contestation and of allegations of the events of the process of competitive concurrence published across the web of the entity called so that, a motive legitimate and set up to oppose to this diffusion coincides. Applied articles: 6.4 LOPD, 34 and 35 RLOPD

To analyze the adequacy to law of the possibility to give way, in the competent Department of the Generalitat, the information of which, in an eventual way, orders the Town Council about the owners of èquids, it will be necessary to evaluate the origin and the purpose for which the Town Council obtained the information, as well as the purpose for which the Department requests the information.

The remission to a Court and on the occasion of an administrative contentious resource of a sanctionative report where documentation that it includes does not represent data of other persons, without these persons being a part in the judicial procedure and without not keeping any relation with the juridical controversy, it constitutes a very severe offense, since they are data related to the commission of administrative offenses. Applied articles: Art. 7.5, 11.2.d) and 44.4.b) LOPD

The treatment of images through cameras of videovigilància in order to control the traffic without the consent of the affected persons and without the concurrence of a legal habilitation is constitutive of a severe offense. Before starting the treatment, it is necessary that the competent authority authorizes the installation and use of the cameras with purpose of traffic control. Applied articles: 6, 44.3.b of the LOPD; additional disposal 8th HIM 4/1997; additional disposal 2nd D 134/1999; 4, 5 of the Instruction 1/2009.

The claim, which founded in the lack of answer to the request of exercise upward of rectification is loved, and, as for the background|bottom, is rejected regarding the request of rectification of the name|noun and incomplete surnames that appeared in the edict of notification of complaint|denunciation and of beginning sanctionative report, to be respectful with the principle|beginning of quality, and it is estimated regarding the rectification of the zip code that it|he|she appeared in the notification of the warning|notice of embargo|distraint, to be erroneous. Applied articles|items: Art. 4 i16 LOPD, 32 RLOPD, Recommendation 1/2008

The claim is loved upward from access, since the responsible has not answered the request of access in the deadline of a foreseen month to the ordering. Applied articles: Art 15 LOPD and 23, 27, 28 and 29 of the RLOPD.

The present protection of rights to consider that the opposition proceeds with respect to the datum of the address estimates that it appears in the medical recipes since the responsible for the treatment has admitted that this datum is unnecessary and because the applicable sectorial regulations do not require the inclusion of this datum. Applied articles: 6.4 LOPD, 34 and 35 RLOPD, RD 1718/2010