Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

Even though the possibility cannot discard that a town councilor can access to information individualized about collection of tributes, the purpose of the access, the amplitude of the request and the special reservation taking into account that it imposes the applicable regulations, the principle of minimization would lead to facilitating the information of way aggregated, or in a way individualized through anonymized listings that they do not allow to establish a correlation between the persons affected, the properties or affected vehicles and the collection with respect to each of them. In so far as the town councilor accesses the information requested for the fulfillment of its legitimate functions, and given the jurisprudence, in principle there does not have to be obstacle so that this access is produced with the accompaniment of an advisor, when this advice is carried out in order to endow the law of the town councilor with effectiveness.

The diffusion in a municipal Plenum, on the part of the president of the Plenum (mayor/ssa) of data related to a person civic, in order to give answer to the formulated complaint for said civic linked to the municipal competences, in the turn of intervention of the public, a behavior is according to the regulations of data protection, always and when the spread information is the suitable and necessary one to give answer to the complaint formulated by the citizen. In particular, the accusing person at the end of a Plenum, in the question-and-answer session the mayoress asked about several aspects that they affected to many departments. And the mayoress answered that to the being a person who asked for many meetings to several departments and complained because did not abide it, he asked for a report to know the hours of loaned attention. This was the motive of complaint, that is the elaboration of this report and the mention in the Plenum. The complaint is filed.

The publication of particulars of two police agents about disciplinary offenses in advertisement in the BOE (in a case after having notified the published event to itself personally) is considered an illicit treatment of particulars of the art. 7.5 of the LOPD. Applied articles: Articles 44.4.b), 4, 7.5, and 11 LOPD.

Resolution of archive, since the communication of the data of contact of a member of the extensive family in another, when both are part of the Plan of Work in the benefit of the accommodated minors, would be left authorized by a Law (LDOIA). The paternal uncle of some internal minors in a shelter had complained because its telephone of contact that had facilitated the center, this had facilitated it to the paternal uncle of the minors. The complaint is filed by the habilitation of the Law of the rights and sen opportunity the childhood and the adolescence (LDOIA), in order to foster the contact among the relatives of minors in regime of reception. Applied articles: Art. 11 LOPD, arts. 5, 116 and 134 LDOIA

Facilitating a non authorized person the access to particulars, harms the duty of secret and is constitutive of a severe offense. The lack of notification of the inscription and suppression of files in the Register of Data Protection of Catalonia, shop assistant of the Authority, is one constitutive of an offense slight. Applied articles: 7, 10, 12 and 39 LOPD; 55 RLOPD; 11 Law 32/2010; 137 LRJPAC

The report is filed, since the cession of data contained in the Register of pets of the Generalitat de Catalunya would subtract the access to this Register, or the general legislation of access to the public information authorized by a Law, or the one that it regulates specifically. Applied articles: Art. 11 LOPD and art. 14.9 D. Leg. 2/2008; Law 19/2014

The claim is loved since the Town Council gave answer to the three requests formulated for the complaining person, but in an incomplete way, without informing the foreseen extreme ones to the art of all of them. 15 of the LOPD. Applied articles: Art. 15 LOPD and 25 RLOPD; DA 1 and art. 24.2 Law 19/2014

The claim is loved for formal motives, since the Town Council did not solve the request in the deadline established, and with respect to the background, because in the given answer it works out incomplete since it does not refer to some of the extremes requested in an express way. Applied articles: Art. 15 LOPD and art 29 RLOPD

To anonymize or to dissociate the information it is necessary to eliminate those data that allow to identify the person affected, direct or indirectly, in reasonable thermal baths, that is, without disproportionate efforts. At the same time, the dissociation should not eliminate elements or information that they make impossible the understanding of the information of whole. This double condition will entail that the Town Council has to make an appraisal or ponderation with respect to which system of dissociation it can be more effective in each case, in the terms that participate in this judgement.

When a system of videovigilància means the catchment of vehicles images to the public way, the regulations of data protection do not give sufficient habilitation to the Town Council to install this system on the public way, because the same can only be carried out by the forces and security corps. In case the applicant town does not have local policeman, only the system of videovigilància could be installed on the public way with regard to the forecasts of the organic Law 4/1997, of videovigilància (LOV), if who control·la the images are the Police that they have competences about the security of the town, with previous request of the authorization of the competent organ. The installation of the system on the part of the Town Council can only be considered legitimate, if the supposition of the article 42.2 of the Law of private security (LSP) is given, in the foreseen terms and conditions in the specific regulations.