The information on which the search is based has been translated by a computer system without human intervention. It may contain errors in vocabulary, syntax or grammar. The translation may also produce mistakes in the searches performed.
252 results were found for your search terms Right of access
Accession rights with extension of the initial application.
PT 34/2022
The claimant requested access to data as an ICS worker. ICS responds after the deadline, but the claimant is considered satisfied as stated in writing to the Authority. The resolution is issued that declares the ICS response extemporaneous.
21/06/2022
Request for information on the traceability of clinical history.
PT 9/2022
The claimant asked the ICS for access to their clinical history and traceability. The ICS responded once the one-month period foreseen for art had elapsed. The Authority's resolution states that the ICS responded extemporarily to the request for access, and regarding the information not delivered concerning traceability, the claim is partially estimated, regarding only information concerning data communications from clinical history (including any data communications to the clinical history shared in Catalonia), since the ICS' response was not clear enough to understand that he had been informed about this end. And the claim is dismissed as regards the other information included in the concept of 'traceability', as it is information that exceeds the material aspect of the right of access to data protection.
21/06/2022
Right access to full file in the requested format. It is not part of the right of access guaranteed by the data protection regulation to know the identification of the persons employed by the person responsible for the treatment that accessed the data.
PT 7/2022
Partial estimate. The claimant has the right to have the person responsible for the treatment supply a copy of the files requested in the format he had requested, in this case, in electronic format.
14/06/2022
Right of access.
PT 148/2021
Estimates of the right of access to emails or other documents containing personal data of the claimant or his representative (son), because the request contained in the submitted request would be considered to fit within the framework of an art right request.
07/06/2022
Clinical history access request.
PT 141/2021
The claimant requested access to information about access to his or her clinical history (HC), and the claimed entity responded, lately, that they did not record undue access to his HC. The Authority estimates the claim of guardianship of the right of access, since the claimed entity did not provide an answer within the time frame set for the applicable law, nor did it inform him of whether data communications existed in the shared clinical history of Catalonia, or of other data communications to other recipients, whether they were external recipients to the claimed entity, or other health centers that, while belonging to the claimed entity, have information systems other than the health center assigned to the claimant.
31/05/2022
The right to access the data source.
PT 154/2021
The person here claiming complained that the City Council had not provided him with the name of persons or entities that had provided the social services with a report issued by a court advisory body (EATAF). In relation to this, the complaint is estimated to the extent that Article 15.1.g of the GPD determines that it is part of the right of access "any information available about its origin", which would therefore include reporting on the identity of the person who submitted the report (if known). However, if the City Council considers that access may be limited, nothing prevents people from being moved from what data may be affected by access, so that they make the appropriate claims.
31/05/2022
Request for access to clinical history.
PT 140/2021
The claimant requested access to information about access to his or her clinical history (HC), and the claimed entity responded, lately, that they did not record undue access to his HC. The Authority estimated the claim of guardianship of the right of access, since the claimed entity did not respond to it within the time frame set to the applicable law, nor did it inform it about whether data communications existed in the shared clinical history of Catalonia, or about other data communications to other recipients, whether they were external recipients to the claimed entity, or other health centers that, while belonging to the claimed entity, have information systems other than that of the health center assigned to the claimant.
26/05/2022
Request to access original document.
PT 138/2021
The claimant requested an entity, by exercising the right of access, to hand over a copy of the document that another public entity had sent him, accrediting in the workplace his status as a victim of gender violence, as well as the original document. The claim is partially estimated as the claimant entity extemporarily resolved the request for access to the copy of the requested document, and is dismissed as regards the request for the submission of the original document, since the right of access provided for in Article 15 of the RGPD does not include the delivery of the original document, but only access to those personal data and to the copying of those data, as well as the right to copy them.
26/05/2022
BOE notification announcements post.
PS 12/2022
In the face of various attempts at notice on unsuccessful paper, a city council published in the BOE Notification Supplement several acts handed down in a disciplinary procedure to a municipal worker, committing three offences for which he was warned. Specifically:1) By violation of the principle of accuracy, by having made an attempt to notify an incorrect address;2) By violation of the principle of Application, by having published an ad in the BOE after having made a single prior notification attempt and an incorrect address; by having published another announcement in the BOE before running out the 10-day deadline granted to the person assigned to collect the documentation in the headquarters; and by having included in several announcements the name and surname of the person concerned, instead of his DNI.3) By violating the principle of minimization, by having included in several announcements in the BOE information on the disciplinary nature of the procedure, as well as other information.
26/05/2022
Right of access.
PT 149/2021
It is dismissed because it is considered that, although the right of access application was treated as a request of the LTC, the entity ended up giving it an answer that would have been the same in case the application had been processed as a right of access under Article 15 of the GPD. Therefore, the request for the right of access, in which the applicant made a specific claim, also received a specific response informing him that the right of access could not be made effective because of the lack of information.
26/05/2022
Total number of pages: 26