The information on which the search is based has been translated by a computer system without human intervention. It may contain errors in vocabulary, syntax or grammar. The translation may also produce mistakes in the searches performed.
646 results were found for your search terms HABEAS DATA RIGHTS
Disrespect of the right to delete data from police records.
PT 28/2023
The claimant asked for the deletion of the data that appeared in the file of the scope of the information systems of the PGD (SIP PF) in relation to police proceedings that led to a short procedure processed by a criminal court. The claim is estimated, since it was based on the lack of response to the request for deletion, but the PGD is required to respond to the request for deletion made by the claimant, even if it is in the negative sense of its request.
05/07/2023
Disclaimer of the right to delete the data of the City Council's electronic headquarters.
PT 6/2023
The claimant requested the deletion of their data from the City Council's electronic headquarters, since it had already far exceeded the purpose for which they were initially authorized, collected and processed, and for this purpose requested the withdrawal of their data from any physical or digital support for which the entity was responsible. The claim of tutelage formulated by the claimant against the City Council is estimated, without making any other pronouncement or any requirement regarding the fund since the right of the claimant has been made effective.
05/07/2023
Right of access.
PT 108/2022
The right of access is estimated because the City Council responded extemporaneously and incompletely. In any case, in relation to the access to the data that would allow the identification of the persons who gave their testimony in a case of risk prevention open against the claimant, it is proposed that before giving access to this information, the City Council can transfer the request of the right of access to the affected persons so that, where appropriate, they can exercise their right of opposition to the processing of their personal data.
30/06/2023
Right of deletion.
PT 5/2023
The claim is rejected since, in this case, the main requirement is lacking in order to be able to require the data controller to carry out the deletion of personal data, since the person who requested this deletion did not appear as the owner of the personal data to be deleted. In this sense, B:SM has accredited that it has been at all times proactive, because it required the applicant to prove his identity, and has given a response adjusted to the circumstances of the case.
28/06/2023
Right of access.
PT 121/2022
The right of access presented by the claimant in which he requested to access his images captured by the video surveillance cameras is estimated, to the extent that it has been verified that the City Council did not give a response to the requester. The interested party has the right to receive a response from the data controller to their request for the right of access, without prejudice to the fact that the entity is only obliged to give access to the information of the points provided for in the different sections of article 15 of the RGPD.
15/06/2023
Ignoring the right of access.
PT 42/2023
The complainant inmate in a penitentiary complains that the center does not provide him with the document "Summary of the inmate". The claim is estimated, given that the Department of Justice, Rights and Memory did not respond in time to the claimant's request. No pronouncement is made on the merits, since the Department of Justice has estimated the request for access.
15/06/2023
Neglect of the right to deletion of police record data.
PT 41/2023
The claim is estimated, given that the General Directorate of the Police of the Department of the Interior did not respond in time to the request of the person making the claim, without it being necessary to make a statement on the merits, given that the DGP has estimated the deletion request.
15/06/2023
Right of access.
PT 113/2022
The claim for protection of the right of access is upheld, given that the complainant exercised the request for the right of access that affected the Department of Health, CatSalut and the ICS, and that with the response given to the person complaining on 24/ 05/2023, it cannot be considered that the 3 responsible entities have made effective the right of access exercised by the complainant, since, although they did give him information about some of the data processing referring to his person, it was not a specific response regarding the rest of the data processing listed in the request. Nor was the person complaining informed of the reasons why information on some treatments is not available.
14/06/2023
Disrespect of the right of access and opposition within the framework of a process of municipal citizen participation.
PT 31/2023
The claimant complained about the lack of attention to their rights of access and opposition that he would have exercised before the City Council, within the framework of his participation in a process of citizen participation of urban theme. The claim is estimated and the City Council is required to make effective the rights of access and opposition of the claimant and to account for this Authority.
02/06/2023
Ignoring the right to deletion of police record data.
PT 40/2023
The claim is estimated, given that the General Directorate of the Police of the Department of the Interior did not respond in time to the request of the person making the claim, without it being necessary to make a statement on the merits, given that the DGP has estimated the deletion request.
02/06/2023
Total number of pages: 65