The information on which the search is based has been translated by a computer system without human intervention. It may contain errors in vocabulary, syntax or grammar. The translation may also produce mistakes in the searches performed.
188 results were found for your search terms Clinical record
Allegedly undue access to clinical history.
IP 245/2022
Apart from the statements made by the current complainant, there is no other element available to confirm the improper nature of access to the clinical history subject to complaint. On the other hand, as has been advanced, the ISC has argued for a reasoned and sufficient reason that access was carried out by an authorised person in order to update information relating to the vaccination against Covid-19 of its staff, of which the person reporting until recently, and that is why the reference actions were archived.
31/08/2022
Patient data access using 4 URLS only entering the DNI, lacks security measures.
PS 20/2022
Resolution is issued, directly as they have not filed any allegations against the IIA. Security measures are imputed, an authentication mechanism due to access to patient data through several hospital URLs only by introducing the DNI without any other access control measures. They claimed that they had erroneously published a 'test environment' and that they have already unpublished these URLs.
21/06/2022
Request for information on the traceability of clinical history.
PT 9/2022
The claimant asked the ICS for access to their clinical history and traceability. The ICS responded once the one-month period foreseen for art had elapsed. The Authority's resolution states that the ICS responded extemporarily to the request for access, and regarding the information not delivered concerning traceability, the claim is partially estimated, regarding only information concerning data communications from clinical history (including any data communications to the clinical history shared in Catalonia), since the ICS' response was not clear enough to understand that he had been informed about this end. And the claim is dismissed as regards the other information included in the concept of 'traceability', as it is information that exceeds the material aspect of the right of access to data protection.
21/06/2022
Delete medical personal data.
PT 18/2022
Since the Pere Mata Institute has reported that the personal data of the person here claiming, subject to their opposition requests, have been suppressed and therefore not subject to treatment, in this case, there is no presupposedness necessary to make this right effective, which is that the person responsible is processing data of the person who is opposed to this treatment. In these terms, it is appropriate to reject the present claim of guardianship of the law, given that the Institute Pere Mata attended to the requests from which this procedure derives, when he informed the current claimant of the deletion of his personal data dated 10/12/2021.
21/06/2022
Use of data from the complainant in the emergency assistance report of a third person and submission of the report.
PS 21/2022
A resolution is issued directly without a motion for a resolution as no allegations were made to the initiation agreement. Existence and confidentiality are impeded. Chief Miami Platja mislinked an urgent attendance report to the whistleblower's data and this led to the HC3 report being uploaded. At the same time, he led to this report being handed over to a third person.
14/06/2022
Dismiss attention right to rectification and/or deletion of personal data in the claimant's clinical course.
PT 155/2021
The answer provided by the ICS is declared to be extemporaneous, by which the request for rectification made by the person claiming not to have responded within the time frame set in the applicable law is dismissed. The claim of the claimant as regards the correction of the annotation in his or her clinical course in relation to the medical visit of date 05/03/2019 is dismissed, since the requested rectification is not appropriate; and the claim as regards the rectification of his or her clinical course in relation to the visit of 26/01/2021 is estimated.
07/06/2022
The request to delete the information contained in the shared clinical history is dismissed.
PT 23/2022
The claimant has not submitted the documentation relating to medical health, nor has he submitted allegations arguing for any circumstances that would prevent the submission of such documentation to the Authority. In this respect, health legislation lays down the time limits for the conservation of integrated documentation in the patient's clinical history, in 5 or 15 years, depending on the type of document in question, without providing for its suppression, when the medical high is not available, which is why the claimant's request is not appropriate.
07/06/2022
Clinical history access request.
PT 141/2021
The claimant requested access to information about access to his or her clinical history (HC), and the claimed entity responded, lately, that they did not record undue access to his HC. The Authority estimates the claim of guardianship of the right of access, since the claimed entity did not provide an answer within the time frame set for the applicable law, nor did it inform him of whether data communications existed in the shared clinical history of Catalonia, or of other data communications to other recipients, whether they were external recipients to the claimed entity, or other health centers that, while belonging to the claimed entity, have information systems other than the health center assigned to the claimant.
31/05/2022
Communication of data to third parties. Presumption of innocence.
IP 64/2022
It is archived to the extent that it has not been proven that the complainant has revealed or communicated to third parties data linked to the complainant and to professionals who would have visited it.
26/05/2022
Request for access to clinical history.
PT 140/2021
The claimant requested access to information about access to his or her clinical history (HC), and the claimed entity responded, lately, that they did not record undue access to his HC. The Authority estimated the claim of guardianship of the right of access, since the claimed entity did not respond to it within the time frame set to the applicable law, nor did it inform it about whether data communications existed in the shared clinical history of Catalonia, or about other data communications to other recipients, whether they were external recipients to the claimed entity, or other health centers that, while belonging to the claimed entity, have information systems other than that of the health center assigned to the claimant.
26/05/2022
Total number of pages: 19