Result of the resolution: Set aside/dismissed
Apart from the statements made by the current complainant, there is no other element available to confirm the improper nature of access to the clinical history subject to complaint. On the other hand, as has been advanced, the ISC has argued for a reasoned and sufficient reason that access was carried out by an authorised person in order to update information relating to the vaccination against Covid-19 of its staff, of which the person reporting until recently, and that is why the reference actions were archived.