The information on which the search is based has been translated by a computer system without human intervention. It may contain errors in vocabulary, syntax or grammar. The translation may also produce mistakes in the searches performed.
91 results were found for your search terms Police
Digital Document Treatment, Videovigilance
IP 325/2019
The part of the complaint relating to the treatment of images recorded by video surveillance cameras in the municipality is archived, because when the complainant submitted applications for the right of access (art.15 GDPR) and opposition right (art.21 GDPR) the cameras were not yet working. Nor can the city council be held responsible for the actions of an agent who had archival documents concerning third parties in his digital folder, as it would be to demand an almost impossible degree of diligence to control the contents of all personal folders of agents. Advertisement to the City Council (Art.58.2.a GDPR) and is required to remove undue documentation, and it is proposed to initiate disciplinary actions (Art.77.3 LOPDGDD).
04/03/2021
Installation of video surveillance cameras for traffic control in the city center
CNS 5/2021
Municipalities that do not have local police, or a body of vigilantes or have signed an agreement in application of article 12.1.fifth.c) of Law 10/1994, of 11 July, on the police of the Generalitat Mossos d 'Squadron, they can't install video surveillance cameras for the purpose of traffic control. Municipalities with a vigilante body may install video surveillance cameras for the purpose of controlling traffic limited to the functions assigned to vigilantes by their specific regulations. In the case of municipalities that have signed an agreement in application of article 12.1.c) of Law 10/1994, of 11 July, of the police of the Generalitat Mossos d'Esquadra of Catalonia, they can install video surveillance cameras for traffic control in the terms established by the said agreement. The installation and use of surveillance cameras for the control, regulation, surveillance and discipline of traffic, must comply with the provisions of the eighth additional provision of Organic Law 4/1997, of 4 August, for which regulates the use of video cameras by the Security Forces and Corps in public places, deployed in Catalonia by the second additional provision of Decree 134/1999, of 18 May, regulating video surveillance by the police of the Generalitat and the local police of Catalonia, as well as the RGPD and the LOPDGDD and Instruction 1/2009, especially the aspects analyzed in the legal basis VI of this opinion.
11/02/2021
Requirement requirement requirement in writing for a city council to transfer data to agents of the Mossos d'esquadra body for an investigation
CNS 50/2020
In the case analysed, the City Council would be obliged to communicate any information relevant to the purposes provided for in Article 22.2 LPD when there is a real danger to public safety or the investigation and prosecution of crimes by police forces. Although there is no explicit provision in the legislation studied on the obligation to formalise the request for information necessarily in writing, it is justified that the request for information from the police force be specified in writing, given the obligation incumbent on the City Council to comply with the principle of proactive responsibility. The communication of personal data without compliance with the principles of data protection may constitute an infringement of the aforementioned principles (Article 83.5 GDPR).
04/02/2021
Breach of safety measures.
IP 159/2020
Even though the existence of a lack of safety measures is ascertained on the part of the DGP, it is filed by|out of|for prescription of the offense.
21/01/2021
Treatments by the Urban Guard.
PS 47/2020
Notifying people affected by illicit access to the SIP, the initiation of disciplinary proceedings against two identified Urban Guard agents, contravenes the principle of confidentiality. Also contrary to the principle of confidentiality is access to the SIP to query the registration of a vehicle, when this access is not motivated in the exercise of the functions entrusted to the agent carrying it out. In the last analysis, making a copy of a report available to a person filed for illicit access to the SIP in which personal data consulted by another agent via the SIP is also recorded, contrary to the principle of application.
21/01/2021
Faculties of the of the Urban .
IP 359/2020
The head|boss of the Urban Guard|Watch can access the information necessary for the exercise of its|his|her|their functions. The recruitment of a company of detectives on the part of a determinate employee to|in title staff, it|he|she is not imputable to the Town Council.
21/01/2021
Access to police background information.
PT 64/2019
The untimeliness of the response of the General Directorate of Police (DGP) to the cancellation request submitted by the complainant is declared, given that the DGP responded, by means of the corresponding resolution, once exhausted the period of one month provided for in the LOPD. As for the merits, it is stated that the DPG has satisfied the right, as it has upheld the request for access.
07/01/2021
The communication of particulars of a in situation of leave of absence on the part of the in Court protected in 6.1 c), legal duty applicable to the responsible for the treatment.
IP 333/2019
The DGP communicated the Court the particulars related to the personal address of an agent of the Police in situation of leave of absence. Previously, the court had required the DGP so that he|she|it quoted the agent of the policemen|lads|police for the usual police canal|channel for which the active agents are summoned who have to loan witness as a result of a police performance|action. The DGP communicated the Court that he|she|it could not use this canal|channel, since the agent was in situation of leave of absence. The Court required the DGP again so that it|he|she communicated the particulars of the agent to quote it in its|his|her|their particular address|home. The DGP fulfilled the judicial requirement and facilitated the Court the data.
11/12/2020
Inclusion of excessive data in a police report.
12/2020
The Town Council is a responsible for a foreseen offense to|in the art. 83.5.a) RGPD in relation to the art. 5.1.c) RGPD, for breach of the principle|beginning of minimization of the data, for the fact that its|his|her|their Local Police gave a report of daily interventions to a person that he|she|it had taken part in an incident in a bank branch of where he was a customer, that information contended on the particular address|home of the underinspector of the branch (apart from the identificatives data for having taken part in the incident), without its|his|her|their consent.
20/11/2020
Access to data for the exercise of its functions.
IP 342/2019
The Chief Inspector of the Guardia Urbana must be able to access any documentation required for the exercise of his functions. In the present case, the documentation accessed by the Chief Inspector was allegations made in the framework of a sanctioning procedure such as the documentation linked to the control of regulated parking, in which the person concerned invoked the his status as an agent of the Guardia Urbana. * The director of the Authority decided to consider the appeal for reversal filed by the complainant against the resolution of the file, regarding the inclusion of the relationship of kinship of the complainant with the owner of the vehicle in a report and the circumstances in which the chief inspector who issued the report would have been aware of this fact.
06/11/2020
Total number of pages: 10