Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

The complainant complained that, within the framework of the processing of a request for access to public information, the GAIP would have revealed to third parties affected by the access, their identity without the latter having requested it. However, in the pre-information phase initiated by this Authority, the complained entity has stated that, one of the persons affected by the access asked to know who was requesting controversial information. In this regard, in accordance with Article 62 RLTC, the GAIP considered, after consulting the applicant, that the submission of the application with its identity could be essential for the defense of the rights and interests held by the third party concerned. That being so, it should be noted that, consulted by the GAIP, the person here denouncing consented to the revelation of his identity. According to the above, therefore, the reported treatment was left open by Article 6.1(a) and c), in connection with the LLT and the LTTE, which is why the present actions are being closed.

The disclosure of data of a user of the Legal Orientation Service of the ICB is reported in a private law firm. ICAB responsibility has not been accredited.

The data processing referred to in the proposed protocol under examination shall comply with the data protection regulations, without prejudice to the considerations made in this opinion and those which it may carry out, as the competent control authority for the processing of data. jurisdictional, the CGPJ. However, it is necessary to revise and modify the consent form of Annex 1 to the Protocol as set out in Section IV of the Opinion.

The entity could|might give in|on the National Archive|File of Catalonia the documents of what it is to title and in which alive physical persons have evidence about relative data that they are part of the documental heritage|patrimony of Catalonia, or for having attained the antique|seniority of 40 years or, if does not attain itself|himself|herself this antique|seniority, if favorable resolution of the counselor of Culture is counted on, without the need for consent of the affected ones, since this donation would constitute a posterior treatment of data that he|she|it would be responsible to until of archive|file in public and, therefore, compatible interest with the initial purpose for which the data were treated.

The medical sending in the Courts and Courts of the sick note of a lawyer on the part of the company or entity in the one that loans services, is considered lawful, in accordance with the regulations of data protection. The particulars contained in that will have to be the necessary minimum temperatures to attain the purpose pursued, in the terms pointed out in the Juridical Foundation V of this judgement, unless it is required by the judicial organ, in which case should be in what establishes that organ.

The claim for denial of the access is rejected to a report of research elaborated by a professional school, since the report refers to persons different of the claimant, and it is therefore necessary to convey it as a claim for denial upward from access to public information, and to transfer it to the GAIP, in accordance with the LTC.

The Foundation finds included in the supposition of the article 156 b) of the Statute of Autonomy of Catalonia, specified in the article 3.h) of the Law 32/2010, of the 1 October, of the Catalan Authority of Data Protection, for which the data processing of the Foundation is linked to the provision of the public service of social services, they are an object of control on the part of the Catalan Authority of Data Protection, to the effects of what orders the regulations of data protection. In relation to the communication of the designation of the representative of data protection, the Foundation on being in the area of performance of the APDCAT included, it has to communicate it to the APDCAT.

The competence corresponds to the CGPJ about the adequacy of the communication of information contained in jurisdictional files, as the one related to the interventions of lawyers and attorneys in judicial procedures during years 2014 to 2016, to the Tributary Administration.

With general character, the individuals would not have sufficient legal habilitation to install cameras of videovigilància in façades of houses that they collect and/or record the image of physical persons on the public way so that this catchment is not merely incidental with respect to the catchment of the property itself. In any case, the competent Authority to know of this supposition, and therefore to whom the inspection would correspond and, if it is proper, the sanction would be the AEPD.