Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

A final resolution is issued, in violation of the principle of accuracy. The IMA notified a provision for mandatory execution in a domicile that had been in its own database since 2007, bypassing the domicile provided by the administration that imposed the sanction, transit, and which is in the DGT database. In addition, it uses a third address, which appears on a payment letter attached to the provision, which has also been in its own database (since 1997), for another vehicle. The facts charged constitute a violation of the principle of accuracy, for having circumvented the implementing regulation in relation to notifications of traffic fines, Article 90 Traffic Law.

A municipal watcher photographs a vehicle with which a traffic offence is allegedly committed, in which the image of the person sitting inside is shown.

File resolution dictated. The whistleblower argues that the SCT uses an obsolete and unauthorized postal address. There is no violation since that address was the one recorded in the DGT database and in accordance with traffic regulations, the obligation to update the address rests with the complainant himself. The STC, on the other hand, acted appropriately because, in accordance with the rules, it first consulted the registration of the DGT and, as the notification proved unsuccessful, it turned to the data on the Padrón.

The complaint is filed because the SCT used the appropriate and exact data that was recorded in the General Vehicle Registration, both in terms of identifying the person holding the vehicle with whom the infringement would have been committed, and in the house where the notification of the initiation agreement was made.

Railway station officers and railway security guards may request, in the exercise of their function of monitoring compliance with the measure adopted by the health authorities consisting of the compulsory use of the mask on public transport, the documentation which accredits the concurrence of any of the causes of exemption from the obligation to wear a mask to those users of the railways who do not wear it.

When the purpose of video surveillance is traffic control, the poster can be limited to reporting the existence of the camera. It is not necessary to report on the identity of the person in charge of the treatment, when the right to information is made effective. The principle of presumption of innocence applies here to the inaccurate treatment of the name of the complainant (who had been modified), when it cannot be ruled out that the complainant had requested the rectification of his name which appeared in the registers of the autonomous Central Transit Prefecture post-reported fact.

SCT, as a responsible for the treatment, did not keep vigil because the datum of the address|home used by the ATC for the practice of the notification of the provision of constraint to the person sanctioned by a driving offense, it was the pertinent one, that it|he|she would be the one that figures in the Register|Record of vehicles (art. 90 of the RDL 6/2015, of 30 October), and that to|in such effects it|he|she communicated the affected person.

To collect and to treat the address in an inaccurate way for the purpose of notification is constitutive of a severe offense.

A citizen shown a claim against the competent organism on the subject of traffic for the denial of access to the information about the data related to a sanctionative report. The regulations of data protection block the access of the claimant to the data requested, in application of the foreseen limitation in the article 23 of the LTC, unless the affected person gives its consent.

El SCT no informava de tots els extrems previstos a l'article 5 de LOPD en les notificacions dels acords d'iniciació dels procediments sancionadors.