Use of obsolete postal addresses for the practice of notification by the IMH.

A final resolution is issued, in violation of the principle of accuracy. The IMA notified a provision for mandatory execution in a domicile that had been in its own database since 2007, bypassing the domicile provided by the administration that imposed the sanction, transit, and which is in the DGT database. In addition, it uses a third address, which appears on a payment letter attached to the provision, which has also been in its own database (since 1997), for another vehicle. The facts charged constitute a violation of the principle of accuracy, for having circumvented the implementing regulation in relation to notifications of traffic fines, Article 90 Traffic Law.