Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

The claimant complained that the PGD had not responded to their requests for data deletion (4 in total) within the period of the legally provided month for this purpose. The complaint filed against the PGD is estimated, since it did not respond in time to its 4 requests, no pronouncement is made regarding the substance of the claim, since the PGD resolved to estimate the requests for deletion submitted by the claimant.

A City Council is reprimanded as being responsible for an infraction due to violation of the principle of legality, for having sent to an inspector of the Generalitat-Mossos d'Esquadra police force two instances with personal data without legal basis, specifically, before the opening of confidential information against the reporting agent, and without there being a real danger to public safety or the investigation and prosecution of a crime.

The person making the claim asked the DGP for access to his personal data contained in the files of the information systems of the Generalitat Police (SIP PF and SIP PFMEN). The claim presented by the person making the claim is appreciated, given that the DGP did not respond to his request in time and no action is required from the DGP, given that he responded in accordance with the law to the request of the claimant person

The claimant asked for the deletion of the data that appeared in the file of the scope of the information systems of the PGD (SIP PF) in relation to police proceedings that led to a short procedure processed by a criminal court. The claim is estimated, since it was based on the lack of response to the request for deletion, but the PGD is required to respond to the request for deletion made by the claimant, even if it is in the negative sense of its request.

The claim is estimated, given that the General Directorate of the Police of the Department of the Interior did not respond in time to the request of the person making the claim, without it being necessary to make a statement on the merits, given that the DGP has estimated the deletion request.

The claim is estimated, given that the General Directorate of the Police of the Department of the Interior did not respond in time to the request of the person making the claim, without it being necessary to make a statement on the merits, given that the DGP has estimated the deletion request.

The claim is partially estimated, given that the Directorate General of the Police of the Department of Interior did not respond in time to the request of the claimant, and as regards the substance of the claim, it is declared that the resolution of the PGD, estimatory of the request for deletion, is in accordance with law.

The claim is partially estimated, since the PGD did not respond in time to the request of the claimant. It is not appropriate to require any action regarding the fund, insofar as the PGD gave a right-to-right response to the request, albeit extemporaneously.

The claim is partially estimated, since the PGD did not respond in time to the request of the claimant. It is not appropriate to require any action regarding the fund, to the extent that the PGD gave a right-to-right response to the request, although extemporaneously

The complaint is partially appreciated, since the Directorate General of Police of the Department of the Interior did not respond in time to the request of the complainant, without it being appropriate to require any action, insofar as the DGP gave a reply adjusted to the right of request, albeit temporarily.