Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

The entity that consult you can communicate the TIP, without including the name and surnames, of the safety vigilantes that have taken part in some incident during the provision of the service, at the request of a user who has participated in the facts . This communication would find an qualification in article 6.1.c) RGPD in relation to the LTC. The entity should inform the affected security guard that their data has been requested by a user before providing the information so that, if applicable, he can allege the personal circumstances on which he is based their opposition to access. Once the resolution of the application for access has been issued, the watchman or security vigilantes who have appeared in the file must also be notified.

Data protection regulations do not preclude access to information on the number of vouchers exchanged per commercial establishment size, and the number of vouchers exchanged per user without identifying the user. The data protection regulations do not prevent the claimant from providing information on the identification of the establishments and the number of vouchers exchanged.

The claimant has the right to access the information held by the City Council regarding the final report of the ISO audits carried out on the residence hall for the last six years, on the accreditation of the residence hall to care for dependent elderly people; the accreditations of the technical management and of the hygienic-sanitary manager of the residence between 2018 and the present, in the terms set out in legal basis VI of this report; and information that does not contain personal data and / or has been anonymized: action protocols, inspection reports and improvement plan, and the list of services offered at the residence.

The access of the professional association to the information of the official Register of Sports Professionals of Catalonia on whether a certain sports professional is registered in it can be based on the legal basis of article 6.1.c) of the RGPD, in connection with the provisions of the transparency legislation. However, access to the professional association for the control of the professional intrusion of a person who is not a member of that association would not be justified by this legal basis.

The claimant requested access to information about access to his or her clinical history (HC), and the claimed entity responded, lately, that they did not record undue access to his HC. The Authority estimates the claim of guardianship of the right of access, since the claimed entity did not provide an answer within the time frame set for the applicable law, nor did it inform him of whether data communications existed in the shared clinical history of Catalonia, or of other data communications to other recipients, whether they were external recipients to the claimed entity, or other health centers that, while belonging to the claimed entity, have information systems other than the health center assigned to the claimant.

This complaint is filed because there are not enough elements available to confirm that the police officer included personal data, relating to the whistleblower's mobile phone, in the police state, contrary to data protection rules.

The person denouncing, who circulated with his motorbike above the sidewalk of a street in Barcelona, reported that an urban guard had photographed, with his particular mobile phone, his DNI, his driving licence and the license plate of his vehicle, although he did not provide any evidence of these events. The City Council denied this, noting that the city guard had collected the identification data through the device provided by the City Council (PDA), for the purpose of filling the newsletter for traffic infringement, and that the processing of the complaint did not require the incorporation of photographic images. The Authority filed the complaint for lack of proof of the reported facts, considering that the demonstrations of the City Council were plausible, bearing in mind that the administrative file processed, which the City Council brought to the Authority, contained no image, and instead contained the aforementioned newsletter, which the city guard filled with the data of the complainant, in the exercise of the public functions entrusted to him.

Cameras installed for traffic control, regulation, surveillance and discipline are regulated by the specific regulation and, supplely, by the personal data protection regulation. The poster can be limited to reporting the existence of the camera or speed control device. Additional information on the processing of personal data must also be provided.

The person here claiming complained that the City Council had not provided him with the name of persons or entities that had provided the social services with a report issued by a court advisory body (EATAF). In relation to this, the complaint is estimated to the extent that Article 15.1.g of the GPD determines that it is part of the right of access "any information available about its origin", which would therefore include reporting on the identity of the person who submitted the report (if known). However, if the City Council considers that access may be limited, nothing prevents people from being moved from what data may be affected by access, so that they make the appropriate claims.

It resolves to admonise the City Council of Vic as responsible for the infringement provided for in Article 83.5.a) in relation to the principle of application. In this regard, it is argued that the publication of a report on the website containing the identity of the person who formulated an administrative contentious appeal against the list of admitted persons and excluded from a selection process, without the legal basis for using this treatment, has been credited.