Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

The person denounced for work harassment was in the report of reserved information initiated as a result of that complaint legitimated for accessing an acting report, a head has closed that reserved information. On the other hand, the instructor organ that processed another reserved information also was authorized to access that report.

Applied articles: Art. 6 LOPD, 37 LRJPAC, 24.1 CE

The claim for discourtesy is loved upward of cancellation, formulated by the legal representative of the minor, in relation in the photographs of this minor, published in the web site of the school. Applied articles: Article 16 LOPD and 31, 32 and 33 of the RLOPD.

The progenitors of a minor who keep the titularity of the authority parental, with independence of itself have attributed the guard and custody of the minor, they have the right to accessing the information acting in the school about the minor, as legal representatives of this. It is because of that that the claim of protection is loved from access upward by one of the progenitors, to whom the school had not facilitated it the mentioned information, formulated. Applied articles: Article 15 and 18 LOPD and 16 Law 32/2010 of the APDCAT.

The complaint is filed for appreciation of prescription, and because the denounced facts would not be constitutive of offense. Applied articles: Arts. 10 and 47 LOPD

It is stated that a town council has harmed the duty of secret since model who had signed a former charge of the Town Council without anonymizing its data (dni) has facilitated a copy of a contract to the pupils of a course. Applied articles: Article 44.3.d) in relation to the article 10 of the LOPD.

It is constitutive of a severe offense for breach of the duty of secret, the to allow data of personal character that third non authorized persons can access of the members of the body of its Local Police that they figured in the hourly work quadrant and the leaves related to the remunerations of complements variable and at the extra times; like this also as to the data contained in the communiqués of police interest of those persons who would presumedly have committed some criminal event. Applied articles: 10 and 44.3.d LOPD.

The legal forecasts of the valid regulations in electrical matter d’energia and in obligatory matter d’expropiació l’accés, without consent, to determinate cadastral data would authorize proteges (name, surname and address) on the part of l’empresa developer d’un eolian minipark, in so far as the knowledge d’aquesta information is necessary to carry out the relation of the goods and rights affected by l’expropiació obligatory, as well as to contact the owners d’aquests goods and the right headlines d’aquests to agree on its value exactly before l’inici of obligatory l’expropiació, and since this company proves to have shown the necessary documentation for that s’iniciï the procedure of administrative l’autorització and l’aprovació of the project of the minipark eolian.

From the aspect of the right to the protection of data, nothing prevents from giving diffusion to the relative information to the suppliers of a local entity that they have consideration of juridical persons in its web portal, since it subtracts the area of application of the regulations of data protection excluded. In the case of individual employer suppliers, the diffusion could find habilitation in the article 53 of the TRLCSP, for which it would not be necessary to have the consent of the affected ones. Regarding the diffusion of that information that refers to the mayor, to the town councilors or to the charges of confidence, even though there is not a rule with rank of law that requires its publication, this would be in agreement with the regulations of data protection if these persons, how affected, decide to give diffusion there. Once this has been said, it cannot be discarded that the diffusion of the information can be carried out, in any case, of aggregated way.

The pretension of the claimant is loved since he considers itself that had the right to accessing the clinical history of its deceased brother, a head analyzed the criteria established in the article 18.4 of the Law 41/2002. Applied articles: Article 18.4 of Law 41/2002, article 18 of the LOPD and 16 of the Law 32/2010 of the APDCAT.