Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

The requesting person has the right to accessing the personal information about her same who figures in a previous reserved information at the beginning of a disciplinary procedure. The access to the information about the denounced agent that it goes beyond its identification with the professional identification number and its participation in the denounced facts, and also the information about third parties who take part in the previous information, as the witnesses, it would only be possible with the previous dissociation of the data of personal character if this dissociation prevents a direct or indirect identification of the persons affected without efforts disproportionate.

The regulations of data protection do not block the access to the budget of the Municipal School of Music, or to the remunerations and regime of dedication that they have to be foreseen to the relation of jobs or that they are part of the general information about remunerations of the public employees depending on the levels and the bodies. However, it would be disproportionate to facilitate a copy of the payroll of each of the affected workers.

The systems of publication of the events that they are part of a selective process of staff portrayed to the consultation it adapts to the regulations of data protection, although it is recommended to implement determinate measures to guarantee the right to the protection of data better. The resolution of the allegations formulated with respect to the provisional list of admitted and excluded candidates has to be notified only to the persons who have formulated them. If they are solved together it is necessary to adopt measures to protect the particulars. In the case of the administrative resources, the resolution, in the exposed terms, has to be notified to all persons who have the consideration of interested.

In the cases in which it has been authorized or recognized the accounting of a secondary activity, the Law 19/2013 justifies, in attention to the prevailing public interest, that the publication of the data incorporates the identificatives data (name, surnames and charge) of the affected public employee, like this how him activity and the company or entity where it develops it, unless the affected person is found special in a situation of protection, circumstance that would justify to carry out a new ponderation. As for the datum related to the location of the company or entity where the secondary activity is developed, it is in principle a matter of an unnecessary information to attain the purpose that the rule pursues, even though in determinate suppositions its publication could be justified.

The data processing carried out by the municipal Group, as a responsible (art. 3 d) LOPD), through the recording and posterior diffusion of the intervention of its spokesman, he has to undergo the principles and guarantees of the regulations of data of personal character protection. The municipal Group, with character previous at the beginning of the treatment, it should create the corresponding file of data (article 20 LOPD), by agreement of the same municipal Group, in accordance with what foresees the article 52 of the RLOPD, to publish it and to notify it to the Register of Data Protection of Catalonia, in accordance with the article 11 of the Law 32/2010.

The regulations of data protection do not block the access retail of the expenses associated with each of the corporative mobiles assigned to each of the mentioned categories to the consultation (town councilors, civil servants or staff of confidence) during year 2015, without including the telephone numbers concrete not even the persons that they have for them assigned.

In the account of Facebook de l'Ajuntament particulars were spread especially protected (health and union membership) related to a person employee of the Town Council. Even though there is some evidence that the divulging would have propitiated it directly or indirectly the Town Council, the evidence is insufficient like fear to sustain the imputation against the Town Council, and because of that stay resolution is dictated.

Applied articles: Article 7 and 44.4.b) of the LOPD.

The claimant, civil servant, asked for the suppression of its identificatives data that figured in some minutes of a Board of recruitment, of which it was part. The claim, for not having given answer in deadline 10 days and also from an optics in the background, estimates the entity in which employee was found, previously he had already estimated the law for him, and to such effect it sent some 2nd minutes to the platform of recruitment without identifying the claimant since in spite of not having proved the concurrence of a motive related to a personal situation with the request, as art. requires 6.4 LOPD, in the instruction of the procedure the entity in which employee was found has made its concurrència.Precisament for this evident.

Applied articles: Article 6.4 LOPD.

Not having the relation of users and not guaranteeing the correct identification and authentication of the users, harms the principle of security of the data and is constitutive of a severe offense. On the other hand, the breach of the duty of secret, it is constitutive of a severe offense. In the last one, not to attend to the requirements for information of the Authority, it also constitutes a severe offense.

Applied articles: 9, 10, 40, 43, 44.3.d, 44.3.h and 44.3.i) LOPD; 91 and 93 RLOPD; 19 of the Law 32/2010.

The present claim is loved because the responsible organ did not make the law of access effective even though the complaining person specified its request.

Applied articles: 15 LOPD, 29 RLOPD.