Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

The regulations of data protection do not block the access of a town councilor to the information claimed in this report and that he confines in the information about the diets and other compensations received by the Mayor, the transfers or cash payments carried out to the Mayor or to its accounts particular, about the payments carried out to an association private, the justificatory documentation of the subsidies or helps granted to this entity, the income carried out in the members of the Commission of Parties, and the payments in concept of performances of work made out of payroll to the workers municipal, all this with respect to the period corresponding to exercises 2011-2015 both included. It does not block the access either to the listing of the subsidies or helps conceded by the Town Council during this same period.

The inclusion of the datum DNI in the fields of information that shape the structure of the certificates qualified as public workers would not be, with general character, adapted at the beginning of minimization. From the point of view of the right to the data protection, it is necessary to appraise the possibility to establish a policy of certification that foresees the utilization of certificates based on pseudonyms, to the effects of avoiding the diffusion of this datum, fully valid option in attention to the forecasts of the ReIDAS.

There is sufficient legal habilitation so that the Hospital, when sanitary assistance to a patient for derivation from a Benefit Society gives collaborator with the Social Security, communicates him the diagnosis of the worker without its express consent (art. 7.3 LOPD), for the fulfillment of the functions of management of the economic benefits and the sanitary assistance derived from professional contingencies (art. 82.2 LGSS), and of follow-up and control of the temporary incapacity for common contingencies (art. 82.4, b sections) and d) LGSS).

The identification through name and surnames (to the detriment of other forms of identification, as it could be the NIF or the no. of card of personal identification provided by the organization itself), of the persons interested in the publications made in the sinus of determinate competitions of provision of jobs of the General Direction of the Police, it does not harm the principle of quality of the data.

Applied articles: 4 and 11 LOPD, 78 EBEP; 59, 60, 61 LRJPAC.

The sending of an electronic mail to a plurality of addressees without using the option of hidden copy (Cco) constitutes a severe offense, for the breach of the duty of secret.

Applied articles: Art. 10 and 44.3.d) LOPD.

The claim of rights protection for denial is loved upward of access, to consider that the affected person had the right to accessing the sun documentation·lcitada related to its report processed by the Unit of Prevention of Work Risk, which was not given to him by the responsible for the file.

Applied articles: Article 15 LOPD, 27 and 28 of the RLOPD.

In sight the regulations, there is not legal habilitation for the cession of patients data with active consumption of addictive substances and with a profession of risk for third, from the Hospital that attends to the patient in the company in which it works. The duty of complaint (art. 262 LECrim) he fits out the communication to the courts and courts or the Fiscal Ministry of facts that they can be constitutive of crimes public, and not to the complaint of mere suspicions, facts or circumstances that could influence on the future commission of some crime or of other situations of risk. It is not inferred from the regulations (LOPD, CP and LECrim) that the judge can fit out the communication of data of the patient given in the Hospital, in the company, to lack, through a dispensation punctual and for concrete cases, of the express consent of the one affected or of a habilitation sufficient in rules with legal rank.

In view of the information facilitated with the consultation the access of the Town Council to the particulars of the persons would not be justified claimants users of the sociosanitary centers of the city of Barcelona. Because of that, it would be necessary to anonymize previously the requested information.

The installation of videovigilància devices in the vehicles that carry out the collection of waste in order to record the itinerary of the same ones and the moment of the collection, in the public way, as well as the installation of videovigilància devices in the helmet of the workers who carry out the collection of waste, it does not have sufficient habilitation legal. The installation of a system of geolocation in the vehicles could work out suitable, if it is proportionate and necessary for the determinate, explicit and legitimate purpose foreseen, and not for other incompatible purposes. This, whenever it does not bring the catchment and engraving of images matched up.

The sending of an electronic mail to a plurality of addressees without using the option of hidden copy (Cco) and the consequent revelation of particulars in third (the address of mail of each one in the rest of addressees) constitutes a severe offense, for the breach of the duty of secret.

Applied articles: 44.3.d) and 10 LOPD.