The information on which the search is based has been translated by a computer system without human intervention. It may contain errors in vocabulary, syntax or grammar. The translation may also produce mistakes in the searches performed.
150 results were found for your search terms Right of suppression
The claim of protection of the person complaining in relation to the exercise upward of suppression is loved.
The complaining person proved to have exercised|exerted the suppression law|right in front of the ICS in relation to a medical diagnosis that figured in the portal "My Health". The ICS alleged that he|she|it could not suppress it|him because they had not gone by 15 years from the date of high of the diagnosis.
22/07/2021
Deleting data.
PT 17/2021
The answer is declared extemporaneous, since the company responsible for the treatment did not respond to the claimant within the legally established time limit, without any further pronouncements or requirements regarding the substance of the claim, since the right of the claimant to delete the data from the file where the data of the municipal swimming pool users is recorded has been made effective.
04/06/2021
Incorporation into shared clinical history of information not linked to the holder of the said history. Delete information.
PT 22/2021
Extemporaneous. The health centre responded, after term, to the claimant, estimating his request to delete HC from information not linked to his person; deletion is considered in accordance with data protection regulations.
04/06/2021
discourtesy of cancellation police records.
The claim for formal motives is loved, since the DGP did not give answer in the legally established deadline|installment. It is not necessary to speak about the background|bottom, since, in a way extemporaneous and once presented the claim, the DGP loved the request of cancellation of police records.
28/04/2021
Incompliance of a guardian resolution (PT 26/19)
PS 60/2020
The City Council did not comply within the time required by the Authority both in the resolution of PT 26/2019, and in the subsequent requirement (14/01/2020), including a warning regarding its eventual non-compliance.
19/04/2021
Right disabling cancellation police background.
PT 16/2021
Declare extemporaneous resolution of cancellation requests. The requested entity estimates the request for the cancellation of the police background.
25/03/2021
Cancellation of police data.
The complaining person asked for the cancellation of determinate data included in police files. The request of the person complaining, since the claimed entity has not invoked any cause that prevents the cancellation, is loved.
19/03/2021
discourtesy of cancellation of police records.
The claim for formal motives is loved, since the DGP did not give answer in the legally foreseen deadline|installment. As for the background|bottom, it is stated that the DPG has satisfied the law|right with respect to the diligences|proceedings of year 2012, and the claim in relation to the cancellation of the data related to the police diligences|proceedings of year 2017 is rejected, although this pronouncement is conditioned to|in the accreditation in the face of the Authority of having made the annotation related to the provisional stay decreed through firm interlocutory.
19/03/2021
Delete various URLs that refer to personal data of the claimant contained in an activity schedule.
PT 66/2020
The City Council's resolution is extemporaneous to the claim of the claimant, since when the claim of guardianship was filed, the City Council had not removed all URLs referring to the document with personal data. The claim is dismissed, in substance, because the City Council removed the remaining URLs once the claim was moved.
11/03/2021
Disregarding the right of suppression (and in their case of opposition).
PT 57/2020
The claimant made a complaint for the alleged disregard of the right to suppress and, in its defect, the right of opposition, in relation to the data corresponding to two Basic Police Training Courses. The claim is estimated in the matter of the deletion of its data for which conservation for archive purposes is not required in the public interest, without prejudice to its blocking or anonymisation. With regard to the subsidiaryity of the right of opposition, the ISPC is considered to have invoked a legitimate imperative reason for the processing of data that must prevail in the opposition of the person claiming no basis in any particular situation for the information or documentation to be retained and that opposition to the retention of the said information would lead to the same result as the exercise of the right to suppress it.
11/03/2021
Total number of pages: 15