The information on which the search is based has been translated by a computer system without human intervention. It may contain errors in vocabulary, syntax or grammar. The translation may also produce mistakes in the searches performed.
100 results were found for your search terms Public safety
request of access and cancellation police records.
PT 67/2017
the claim is loved for not having given answer in the specified period to the effect, without it being necessary to make any requirement, since both rights have been made effective on the part of the DGP, although extemporàniament.
12/06/2018
Lawful communication of particulars.
IP 118/2018
Is considered that the communications of particulars on the part of the School so much in the MMEE and to the Social Services it was legitimated for application of the Law of Criminal Judgement and the organic Law of Juridical Protection of the Minors.
12/06/2018
Communication of included data to police statements.
PS 54/2017
The communication to a third person of the particulars (name and surnames and no. of mobile telephone) of the witness of some not made -picked up for the purpose of elaborating the police statement- even the previous ponderation of the rights, without the consent of the witness nor the concurrence of a legal habilitation, in conflict (art. 24.2 and 31.1 LTC) it constitutes an offense severe.
31/05/2018
Access of a police body to images of videovigilància picked up by the local police of a Town Council
CNS 28/2018
The communication of the images of which he orders the Local Police of the Town Council towards another police body when, in spite of not bringing a writ, he requests them in exercise of its functions of Judicial Policeman it constitutes a cession fitted out so much by the article 11.2.d) of the LOPD as for the LOPJ. This communication, in exercise of its competences on the subject of law and order, would also remain fitted out by the LOV as well as by the article 21 of the LOPD. In any case, the request has to fit to the principles of limitation of the purpose and minimization of data, requirement that is given, by the information of which it is ordered, in the examined case.
17/05/2018
- SECTORIAL AREA
- Public safety
- TRANSFER OR DISCLOSURE OF DATA
- Law enforcement authorities
- Judges and courts
- PERSONAL DATA
- Image
- ENTITIES
- Public administration
- Autonomous community administration
- Local administration
- Council
- PRINCIPLES
- Purpose limitation principle
- Law-enforcement purposes
- Quality principle
- Accuracy
- Proportionality
- VIDEO SURVEILLANCE
Claim related to the right of access to police data.
PT 1/2018
The present claim is loved because the responsible organ did not make the law of access of the complaining person effective in the deadline established by the applicable regulations. Is not required but so that the law makes to have made him effective effective since in the formality of audience the responsible organ has accredited.
26/04/2018
Cancellation of data related to police records.
PT 59/2017
The claim is loved because the DGP answered the request of cancellation very much beyond the deadline of 10 days. As for the background, the claim is rejected to consider pertinent the denial of the cancellation of the police data of the person complaining stored in file
26/04/2018
Cancellation of data related to police records.
PT 65/2017
The claim is loved because the DGP answered the request of cancellation very much beyond the deadline of 10 days. As for the background, the claim is rejected to consider pertinent the denial of the cancellation of the police data of the person complaining stored in file
03/04/2018
Cancellation of data related to police records.
PT 70/2017
The claim is loved because the DGP answered the request of cancellation very much beyond the deadline of 10 days. As for the background, the claim is rejected to consider pertinent the denial of the cancellation of the police data of the person complaining stored in file.
09/02/2018
Cancellation of data related to police records.
PT 57/2017
The claim is loved because the DGP answered the request of cancellation very much beyond the deadline of 10 days. As for the background, the claim is rejected to consider pertinent the denial of the cancellation of the police data of the person complaining stored in file.
09/02/2018
system of videovigilància without informing, and that picks up excessive data.
PS 35/2017
To pick up images beyond what is indispensable to attain the purpose of pursued surveillance, is constitutive of a severe offense. Not to place informative posters in each of the main accesses to the plants of the buildings that count on cameras and not to provide to the affected persons information about the rest of foreseen points in the article 5.1 of the LOPD through forms, web or electronic headquarters, it is constitutive of an offense slight.
09/02/2018
Total number of pages: 10