Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

The claim for denial is loved upward of cancellation, for formal motives, since the DGP solved the deadline established statutorily overcome abundantly, and is rejected with respect to the background, since the requested cancellation does not proceed. Applied articles: Arts. 16, 22 and 23 LOPD and art. 32 RLOPD

The Authority is not competent in relation in the requests of access to the public information that do not refer only to particulars of the requesting person. Applied articles: 24.3 Law 19/2014

The publication of the agreements adopted by an entity that have significance juridical or doctrinal interest in its web previous dissociation of the particulars that can be evident there on it being about information has to be carried out personal surnames not relieving to attain the supposed purpose with the publication, except the name, and charge of the members of the Plenum. However, when, in spite of the anonimització, the affected persons can be identifiable without requiring disproportionate efforts it would be justified to substitute the publication of the agreement for a summary of the performance carried out.

The law|right to|in the data protection of personal character it|he|she does not prevent the access of the complaining person, that it|he|she has the condition of town councilor, to|in a relation|relationship of the staff of the Town Council with indication of the name|noun, charge|post and dirty|gross remunerations perceived by all the concepts during year 2014, in it being itself|himself|herself a matter of information necessary for the exercise of the functions that correspond to him|her as a town councilor to|in the opposition|entrance examination in this Town Council.

The law of access of the person claiming from the clinical history for formal reasons, although it is rejected for reasons in the background, since the hospital already facilitated it, everything is loved and that in an extemporània way, the access to the information. Applied articles: 15 LOPD; 27, 28 and 29 RLOPD; 13 Law 21/2000; 18 Law 41/2002

The right of access of the complaining person to its data of health is loved. Applied articles: 15 LOPD; 27, 28 and 29 RLOPD; 13 Law 21/2000; 18 Law 41/2002

The applicant, that it has the condition of interested, it has to have access to the identification data of the persons that they have intervened in the selection process due to its charge, to the information of the selected person who does not have consideration of especially protege, as well as to the decree of recruitment of the selected person. Regarding the data especially proteges (article 7 LOPD), and others that can give a profile of vulnerability of the affected ones, they have to remain excluded from the access, as well as the unnecessary particulars for the purpose of control of the selection process of the job. In case it is necessary to give copy of the documentation, it would be convenient to remember the duty of confidentiality with respect to the received information (article 10 LOPD), so that this cannot be used for a purpose different to the one that justifies the access (article 4 LOPD).

To allow a document with particulars the access in third non authorized harms the duty of secret, which constitutes a severe offense. Applied articles: 10, 44.3.d LOPD

Three offenses are stated, them all related with the installation of a system of videovigilància in the headquarters of the Local Police of the town. In first place, an offense by lack of creation of file is stated, since even though the disposal of creation of the file of videovigilància had been approved, this had not been published in the corresponding official bulletin. In second place, a breach of the duty is stated of informing since, on the one hand, images had been picked up without having installed the preceptive informative posters, and, on the other hand, he had not informed itself through other canals made clear to the instruction 1/2009. And, in third place, a breach is declared proportionality principle for the uninterruptible catchment -and posterior storage- of images of the inside of the cells of persons under arrest. Applied articles: 4.1, 5, 20, 44.2.c) 44.3.a) and 44.3.c) of the LOPD; 52 RLOPD; 7 and 12 Instruction 1/2009

Ordinance accuses himself of illicit communication because local police raised complaint form for offense with data of 2 persons who according to the denouncer do not have anything to do, in such a way that in that to give copy of the event at two o'clock particulars are being revealed to third one. Applied articles: Art. 11 and 44.3.k) of the LOPD