Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

The complaint to consider that the communication of the particulars included in an urbanistic report was protected is filed by the right of access to the public information, according to the foreseen one to the Law of Transparency. In particular, once made the corresponding ponderation, it is considered that the law of access prevails since its exercise had the control as a purpose of legality, and also for the time gone by, since it was a matter of a processed report in year 1973.

Applied articles: 3, 11 LOPD and Llei 19/2014.

The claim is loved because the responsible organ would not have satisfied in its|his|her|their whole the law|right of exercised|exerted access, motive for which the documentation that is missing is required to the entity claimed so that it|he|she facilitates it|him|her or, for the case that it|he|she does not have her, who communicates it to him|her.

Applied articles|items: 15 LOPD, 27 and 29 RLOPD.

In this case, the Town Council is authorized to check out the fulfillment of the requirements of participation in the non endorsing popular consultation that he is appraising to carry out through the consultation of the particulars that figure in the Register of participation in non endorsing popular consultations, in accordance with the procedure established in the Law 10/2014.

The regulations of data protection do not block the access of a town councilor to the information claimed in this report, and that, the department that would have ordered them, the number of workers and the work hours employed to making these tasks, as well as the calls and the made communications that can be there linked, are specified in the listing of tasks carried out for municipal workers for a private association.

The regulations of data protection personal it does not prevent to communicate the information about the whole of the recruitments of staff, with independence of the modality used, made by the Town Council during the period of 24 March of 2011 in 16 May of 2016, to loan service to the Squad of works of the Town Council and, specifically, the information about the date of beginning and of completion of the contract, the name and surnames of the person hired, the professional category of the worker hired, or the remuneration corresponding to the level or category of the job, in the terms pointed out.

This phase of previous information is filed to consider that in the present case the right to the freedom of information prevails about the right to the data protection personal. In particular, is considered that the information spread in a Plenum about the beginning of a report informative/disciplinary against a person civil servant it was justified in so far as this revelation was a consequence of the motives for which two matters that had to be treated were withdrawn of the agenda.

Applied articles: 10, 44.3 d) LOPD.

The right to the data protection does not block the access of the person complaining retail (amount, date and cause) of the diets and compensations due to mileage perceived by the Mayor of the local corporation during the mandate corresponding to years 2011 to 2015.

An illicit communication of data of the CEIP to the representative of a class is imputed, on the occasion of the cession of the number of teléfon of the parents of pupils in order to create a group of whatsapp, without the consent of the affected ones.

Applied articles: Article 11 and 44.3.k) LOPD.

The regulations of data protection do not block the access of a town councilor to the information about the diets and other compensations received by the Mayor and the transfers or cash payments carried out to the Mayor or to its particular accounts with respect to the period corresponding to exercises 2011-2015 both included.

The regulations of data protection of personal character do not block the access of any citizen to a declaration that indicates the patrimonial situation of the mayor, since the regulations of transparency foresee expressly the duty to publish this information. As for the relation of the helps and subsidies conceded by the Town Council the last five years, including the identification of the beneficiary and the amount of the help, the regulations of data protection do not prevent this information from any citizen accessing since the regulations of transparency foresee expressly its publication, except in the case of subsidies and public helps conceded by motives of social vulnerability, in which the identity of the beneficiaries will have to be preserved.