The information on which the search is based has been translated by a computer system without human intervention. It may contain errors in vocabulary, syntax or grammar. The translation may also produce mistakes in the searches performed.
91 results were found for your search terms Police
Discard police background data.
PT 66/2022
The PDB resolution estimating the request for the deletion of the personal data contained in the claimant's SIP file is declared extemporaneous, without going into any other considerations regarding the background since the PDB has resolved to delete its personal data and the PDB is required to prove that it has notified the estimation resolution to the claimant.
28/07/2022
Discard the right of suppression.
PT 61/2022
The response of the PDB is declared to be extemporaneous, where it is reported that the deletion of the data requested by the claimant has been made effective. The claim of guardianship made by the claimant against the GDPR is dismissed.
28/07/2022
Deleting data from formatting activities performed in ISPC.
PT 49/2022
The claimant requested the deletion of their data linked to training activities, and also requested that any third-party recipients be notified of the deletion of the aforementioned data. The claim of guardianship made by the claimant against the Institute of Public Security of Catalonia is dismissed, except in respect of the communication of the deletion of the data to any recipients who had previously communicated them. The ISPC is required to communicate data that has been deleted to each of the third recipients that had been previously provided, or to inform the person claiming that the deleted data had not been communicated to third parties, and within 10 days accredit the Authority that has fulfilled this requirement.
28/07/2022
Using GPS devices for work control.
PS 7/2022
The City Council is admonished as responsible for a very serious infringement by having dealt with personal data of its Local Police agents obtained through the installation of geolocation receivers (GPS) in various police vehicles, without having previously informed them of the ends provided for in Article 13 of the GPD, including the purpose of treatment (Art. 13.1.c GDPR). In particular, with regard to this latest information (Art. 13.1.c GDPR), on the possibility of dealing with data obtained for the exercise of worker control functions (disciplinary procedure). In the initiation agreement the part of the complaint was archived regarding the use of recordings through video surveillance cameras by work control, without having previously reported them, since it is not known that through this system the City Council has treated personal data from the agent denouncing for this purpose.
06/07/2022
Inclusion in a police attestation of a lawyer's personal mobile phone number.
IP 235/2021
This complaint is filed because there are not enough elements available to confirm that the police officer included personal data, relating to the whistleblower's mobile phone, in the police state, contrary to data protection rules.
31/05/2022
It was reported that a local policeman had photographed data from a citizen on his particular cell phone.
IP 370/2020
The person denouncing, who circulated with his motorbike above the sidewalk of a street in Barcelona, reported that an urban guard had photographed, with his particular mobile phone, his DNI, his driving licence and the license plate of his vehicle, although he did not provide any evidence of these events. The City Council denied this, noting that the city guard had collected the identification data through the device provided by the City Council (PDA), for the purpose of filling the newsletter for traffic infringement, and that the processing of the complaint did not require the incorporation of photographic images. The Authority filed the complaint for lack of proof of the reported facts, considering that the demonstrations of the City Council were plausible, bearing in mind that the administrative file processed, which the City Council brought to the Authority, contained no image, and instead contained the aforementioned newsletter, which the city guard filled with the data of the complainant, in the exercise of the public functions entrusted to him.
31/05/2022
Illicit communication of medical data.
PS 13/2022
The city council of Vic, as responsible for the offence provided for in Article 83.5a, is resolved to be admonished in relation to the principle of confidentiality, since the communication of the medical data of the complainant to the Commissariat of Mossos d'Esquadra de Vic has been credited as a result of a human error.
31/05/2022
Request for deletion of denied data.
PT 29/2022
The resolution of the PDB is declared extemporaneous, which resolves the request of the claimant for refusal to delete data. It is dismissed in substance, since the judicial pronouncement of provisional oversecution, as the PDB maintains, does not prevent the police investigation from being kept open, when the corresponding limitation period has not been exceeded.
26/05/2022
Disabling the right of access to police background data.
PT 33/2022
The claim of guardianship made by the claimant against the GDPR is estimated, and is required to make the right of access effective.
11/05/2022
Disabling the right of access to police background data.
PT 32/2022
The claim of guardianship made by the claimant against the GDPR is estimated, and is required to make the right of access effective.
11/05/2022
Total number of pages: 10