Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

A Chief of a Police Basic Area responded to a request made by a judge (on whether a City Council requested the SIP user leave of the person complaining), when according to the person denouncing who should have responded is the head of the DSIP. The complaint is filed because it cannot be ruled out that it was the judge himself who requested the information to the head of the aforementioned ABP, either because it was his police reference for the Generalitat Police in the municipality to which the judicial body belonged, or because the City Council - subject to the consultation made by the Court - belonged to that ABP. On the other hand, if the head of the ABP had access to the information requested by the Court, he would be legitimized for communicating it to the court. Nor can it be ruled out that the head of the DSIP had authorized it.

It was reported that a chief of the Urban Guard of a City Council, (1) had sent an unencrypted email to the head of the unit in charge of managing the Police Information Systems (SIP) requesting that the person complaining be unpaid as a user of the SIP, in contravention of the SIP Security Manual. He also denounced (2) that the City Council had requested audits of access to the SIP made by the complainant, without legal cause and to a person who was not responsible. The complaint is filed for the following reasons: (1) it is not known that the mail was sent unencrypted (and in any case the facts would be prescribed), and the sending of the mail to the security chief would be covered by the fulfilment of the functions entrusted to the head of the PL; (2) As regards the requests for audit, they are not specific to which requests it refers, there is no record of them being sent to the incompetent person, nor the rule that would have been contravened. In any case, the complainant already filed a complaint with the Authority, concerning the application of an audit application for alleged misuse of the SIP, and the Authority filed the complaint on the grounds that the audit request was legitimate.

An inspector-in-chief of a local policeman sent an e-mail to different people, all of whom were employees of the same city hall, in which he stated that he had filed a complaint for harassment by working, identifying the supposedly bullying person. The complaint is archived in that it is a privately sent mail, not in the exercise of the public functions entrusted, and that the information it contains is the conviction of the mailer and can be framed within the scope of personal opinion, so the City Council is not responsible for it.

The City Council did not comply within the time required by the Authority both in the resolution of PT 26/2019, and in the subsequent requirement (14/01/2020), including a warning regarding its eventual non-compliance.

It is proper to dictate the archive|file when the person that one determinate validated cannot be specified dominates of internet through a network|net wifi of courtesy; like this as|like when it|he|she cannot accredit that the source|fountain of where the electronic mail addresses where it|he|she was sent were obtained these Post Office happened one of the municipal data bases that contain the field of the electronic mail address.

It is proper to dictate the archive|file when the person that one determinate validated cannot be specified dominates of internet through a network|net wifi of courtesy; like this as|like when it|he|she cannot accredit that the source|fountain of where the electronic mail addresses where it|he|she was sent were obtained these Post Office happened one of the municipal data bases that contain the field of the electronic mail address.

It is proper to dictate the archive|file when the person that one determinate validated cannot be specified dominates of internet through a network|net wifi of courtesy; like this as|like when it|he|she cannot accredit that the source|fountain of where the electronic mail addresses where it|he|she was sent were obtained these Post Office happened one of the municipal data bases that contain the field of the electronic mail address.

It is proper to dictate the archive|file when the person that one determinate validated cannot be specified dominates of internet through a network|net wifi of courtesy; like this as|like when it|he|she cannot accredit that the source|fountain of where the electronic mail addresses where it|he|she was sent were obtained these Post Office happened one of the municipal data bases that contain the field of the electronic mail address.

The access on the part of third parties to the dependences from the responsible where there is a computer team|equipment, does not imply for yes same that these can access the information that is stored in that computer, whenever the suitable safety measures are implemented in order to guarantee that non authorized third parties cannot access particulars.