Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

In accordance with the rules on the protection of personal data, the access of the claimant to the full content of the requested files is not justified, given the nature of the personal information of the files and the persons affected. This is without prejudice to the provision of anonymised or pseudonymized information which allows the calculations made in each case to be verified and verified, without allowing the identification or re-identification of the persons affected.

Taking into account the principle of minimization, it cannot be considered that article 15.1.e) of the LTC is a sufficient enabling rule for the City Council to disseminate in the examined case the identity of the monitors and the amount received by them, as individualized, in compliance with the obligation of active advertising. This is without prejudice to the fact that the City Council must access the identity of the monitors hired by the AMPA and the remuneration received for the control of the subsidy.

The identification of the persons interested in the publication of the administrative acts in the procedures for granting subsidies, in accordance with the Seventh Additional Provision of the LOPDGDD, must be determined based on the purpose of the publication. When the publication has the purpose of general publicity of the administrative act, the identification of the interested parties must be done with the first and last name together with the 4 digits of their national identity document, the foreigner's identity number , the passport or an equivalent document (following for the determination of the 4 digits, the criteria of the Provisional Guidance approved by the data protection authorities). When the publication of the administrative act has the sole purpose of notifying the interested persons, their identification must be done with the number of their national identity document, the foreigner's identity number, the passport or an equivalent document.

Access to the copying of grants and grants, carried out in general time and indiscriminately with regard to all types of grants relating to one or more persons of the same property, in view of the circumstances exposed and the rules on the protection of personal data, would not be justified in accessing the requested information.

In accordance with the regulations of data protection it is not justified to publish the name and surnames, number of DNI and signature of the person that the declaration describes about the remunerations of the managerial charges and administrators of the entity to the effects that the article establishes 15.2 LTC, being sufficient to publish the remuneration associated with each of the organs of direction or administration of the entity.

The regulations of data protection do not prevent from facilitating a relation of research projects and of publications that have been carried out at University, with identification of the persons who have taken part in it, nor it would prevent to communicate to the complaining person the reports of projects follow-up and the justification of expenses, the requested bills, as well as the information about the recruitment and the remunerations included, including the identity of the persons affected. This, without harm of omitting those identification data (as the NIF or the address of the affected persons) as well as other particulars that, beyond the identification of the adjudicator or of the teachers and investigators assigned to the projects, can figure in the requested documentation and are unnecessary to attain the purpose of transparency pursued.

In view of the regulations of data protection of personal character, the access on the part of the school is not justified to the relation of the beneficiary persons of the subsidies for the acquisition of school equipment of the schooled pupils in centers funded with public funds of the town, beyond those suppositions in which the access has the consent of the beneficiaries as a juridical basis. All this without harm that information anonymized with respect to the beneficiaries for the subsidies can give to itself in the school.

In view of the regulations of data protection of personal character, the access of the entity claiming from the information that it allows to identify the beneficiary persons of subsidies and helps on the subject of housing with indication of the amount is not justified perceived by these concepts. This, without harm that this type of information can be facilitated in an aggregated or anonymized way.