Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

The archive proceeds when there is not evidence that allows to infer the breach from the principle of purpose with respect to the data of the census of inhabitants. It is not evident accredited that anniversaries were used to congratulate. Applied articles: Art. 4.2 LOPD and 137 LRJPAC

The claim is loved for not having answered the request of opposition in deadline. As for the background, it would seem that on still requesting the depublication of the data to internet the selective process that they were set in, motive by which it is rejected, was in formality. However it is, the Town Council is required so that it gives express answer to the request. Applied articles: art. 6.4 LOPD; 34 and 35 RLOPD; 59.6.b) LRJPAC and 12 Lei 11/2007

The claim is rejected because he does not base itself on law of access LOPD, but in right to know identity responsible procedure of a report. Applied articles: Art. 15 and 18 LOPD; 16 LAPDCAT; and 35.b) LRJPAC

Is desisted from the claim because the Department attended and made cash the law in shape and it finishes applied Articles: Art. 6.4 LOPD and art. 35 RLOPD

It proceeds to love the law of access because the denial of the access to the writing requested by the user of the Social Services founded in the fact that it was about an internal document does not correspond with any rated cause of denial of the access. Applied articles: Art. 30.2 RLOPD, 10.d) Law 12/2007

This Judgement examines the implications of a Project related with the analysis and exploitation of the data of the electronic clinical history. Among other questions, it is considered necessary to specify and to clarify several questions, among others: the files related with the Project; the purposes, fitted out by the regulations, which the requests of information can fit out; establishing a suitable procedure of analysis of information requests; if the information will be treated in an anonymized way or with regard to the consent; the diffusion that can be made of the treated information; the forecast of an integral model of security; the technical procedure of anonimització; or the exercise of the rights I ARCO and l'opt-out. It is also recommended, among other questions, to incorporate an evaluation of impact about the privacy (PIA).

It is applicable for the system of videovigilància installed in the deposit of persons under arrest and to the room of search of the local police of the Town Council, as well as in the inside of the vehicles of the local police, the regulations of protection of particulars (LOPD and RLOPD, and Instruction 1/2009). To the data processing derived from systems of videovigilància in the exterior of the police vehicles, the regime established in the LOVFCS, and its regulations of development is applicable. The data processing made in the inside of the police vehicles could remain integrated into an existing file or create a new one. It is not necessary to create any file in relation to the videovigilància in the exterior of the police vehicles. It is necessary to give fulfillment to the duty of information (art. 5 LOPD and 12 Instruction), in the terms pointed out in the Judgement.

L'ús de les dades a les quals té accés l'encarregat del tractament, per una finalitat diferent a l'estipulada en el contracte, és contrari al principi de qualitat de les dades en la seva vessant de proporcionalitat.
*Quantia de la sanció rebaixada per sentència de data 21/02/2020 núm. 713/2020 del Tribunal Superior de Justícia de Catalunya (recurs d'apel·lació núm. 38/2017).