Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

The complaint is shelved because there are no rational indications that the facts that have led to the initiation of the procedure have taken place. As regards the duty of information on the purpose of the treatment, compliance has been accredited.

It would not be appropriate for data protection regulations to provide information on the identity of Members of Parliament who have been assigned security in the current legislature (except in cases where the regulations expressly provide for this, due to office). , the reason and origin of the decision of the allocation, and the exact dates of the endowment relative to both the current legislature and the XI and XII legislatures, since this information can affect both the safety of the people affected and aspects of his private life and even his personal and family intimacy.

It would not be in accordance with data protection regulations to provide information on the identity of the members of Parliament who have been assigned security in the last five legislatures, the reason for the assignment and the type of device (police force or private security) established in each case, given that this information can affect both the safety of the people affected and aspects of their private life and even their personal and family privacy.

The catchment of images of identified physical persons or identifiable with purposes of surveillance in public spaces and on the public way corresponds, normally, to the forces and security corps. Exceptionally this catchment in the outer spaces of the precincts made could be accepted as valid by a company of private security if, previous shapeless of the Commission of Devices of Videovigilància Control, is counted out with the corresponding administrative authorization in accordance with the Law of private security and the HIM 4/1997. Likewise, other precincts, once their characteristics had been attended to, could manage to be considered private like spaces during its timetable of closing.