Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

The recruitment of the services Google Apps for Business for a local council requires the realization d’una previous analysis of the risks that for the security and integrity of the personal information its treatment can entail in environments that work in the “núvol”. In the measure that Google Ireland Limited makes a data processing on account of the responsible, the recruitment of its services requires, d’entrada, the signature d’un contract d’encarregat of the treatment. However, the conditions in which subjects itself the service Google Apps for Business attended to, l’existència d’aquest contract d’encarregat so that it uses does not presuppose that the treatment of the data for Google Ireland Limited is carried to term always with all the guarantees required by the Spanish regulations of protection of data of personal character.

It corresponds to l’alcalde of the corporation, d’acord with what establishes the municipal organic Regulations, to decide about the possibility to engrave the sessions of the plenum of the corporation that they have public character, d’acord with the principle of proportionality. The catchment of the images of the plenum on the part of assistant persons to the public is part of competence l’àmbit of l’Agencia Española de Protección de Datos.

Facilitating the access to obrants particulars in an administrative report to whom person interested in that report is, cannot be considered like an illicit cession of data, since there is a rule with rank of law that fits out this access. This, without harm of the need to consider the rights and present interests in the concrete case. Applied articles: 11.2.d) LOPD, 26 Law 26/2010, 35 Law 30/1992, and 155 DLEG 2/2003

Since the person who requests the information is the holder of the denounced commercial establishment, it is necessary to recognize the condition of person interested in the procedure in progress for him; this condition gives the sufficient legal coverage to access to the report (article 35.a) LRJPAC), without the consent of the denouncer. In relation to closed reports, the denounced one has a legitimate and direct interest, for which there is habilitation for the communication of the data, without the consent of the denouncer (article 37.3 LRJPAC). All this, without harm of the exercise of the rights I ARCO on the part of the denouncer, specifically, upward of opposition.