Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

The treatment of the datum related to the number of the credit card of the accusing person to carry out charges that effectively correspond to loaned services, does not mean a breach of the regulations of data protection. Applied articles: 6 LOPD, 10 and 20 Decree 278/1993

It is not necessary the creation and inscription of the file with respect to the treatments of images through cameras carried out by the forces and security corps. The archive proceeds when the images are not used with the denounced purpose; when cash is made the law of information; and when is the period of conservation not superior to the one foreseen by the specific regulations. Applied articles: 5 LOPD; 5 RLOPD; 8, 9, 11 and 12 Instruction of 1 o'clock/2009; 1, 2, 4, 6 and 7 of the Decree 78/2010

The complaint is filed, since although the SCT processed a sanctionative report against a person mistaken by an error in the reading of the registration picked up by the radar, he proceeded to its rectification as soon as the affected one communicated it, and before having knowledge of the present complaint. Applied articles: Art. 4.3 and 4.4 LOPD

The right to the protection of personal character data does not block the access of any citizen to information about the jobs of a determinate scale related to the code of the job, if the place is occupied or type of provision vacant, if it is it for civil servant of career or temporary officer, and if there is reservation of square. However the information about the motive of the reservation of square can be disproportionate, once the affectation that can have the revelation of this information for the private life of the affected person has been attended to.

The severe offense of breach of the duty of secret, to remit an electronic mail to a plurality of workers with data about a concrete working person, is stated without being justified. On the other hand, also the severe offense of breach of the principle of security is stated, because the configuration of a computer tool allowed particulars that were not necessary for the exercise of its functions that all users accessed. Applied articles: 4, 6, 9, 10, 44.3.d, 44.3.h LOPD; 91 RLOPD.

The access on the part of an agent to particulars that appear to the files of the General Direction of the Police -in which access has its condition of agent given- constitutes an illicit treatment when this access does not have relation with the police performances. Applied articles: article 4.2, 44.3 c) LOPD

The diffusion for internet -without any type of restriction- of particulars about the that the duty of secret relapses it constitutes an offense of the LOPD even if the diffusion on the part of the responsible organ has not been produced intentionally. Applied articles: 10 and 44.3 d) LOPD

The claim of cancellation is rejected for the police need to preserve the data, as long as the eventual crimes have not prescribed. Applied articles: 22, 23 LOPD

The claim of cancellation is rejected for the police need to preserve the data, as long as the eventual crimes have not prescribed. Applied articles: 22, 23 LOPD

The claim is loved for formal reasons, but it is rejected for reasons in the background, once the existence of a TAAD that solves the conservation of the documentation for a period of 5 years until the extinction of the effects of the title has been attended to. However a series of final considerations concerning the possibility of cancellation on behalf of the documents that compose the report are made. Applied articles: Art. 16 LOPD, art.33 RLOPD, art. 9 Law 10/2001 and arts. 8 and 10 Decree 13/2008