Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

The complainant complained that the IMHB had not notified him during the years 2017-2019 of the IBI receipts of his property and car park, despite having requested it in writing in 2017. The complaint is filed to consider: 1) that the fact that the municipal archives contain an erroneous tax address would not be attributable to the IMHB, as it is the address listed in the AEAT database, and the complainant had not requested from the IMHB, by means of an express declaration and following the established procedure, his change of tax address, as required by article 31 of the General Tax Ordinance; and 2) with regard to the address for notification purposes, the complainant's letter was not clear, as it referred to the address of (...), in reference to a city, without specifying which one in particular of the two he has. So the necessary element of guilt does not concur in the action of the IMHB, and in any case the facts do not have sufficient punitive entity.

The qualification of the degree of disability carried out by the competent technical bodies is independent of the technical assessments carried out by other bodies in the exercise of their public powers.

The right to information must be exercised in the collection of data. When consent is requested for more than one purpose, it must be specific. In order to comply with the transparency obligations, it is not necessary to publish the handwritten signature.

In accordance with the principle of minimization, it is not necessary to include the DNI in the qualified certificates issued to public employees. The principle of guilt is applicable when the person responsible acts with the conviction that he did not commit any breach of data protection regulations.

In accordance with the principle of minimization, it is not necessary to include the DNI in the qualified certificates issued to public employees. The principle of guilt is applicable when the person responsible acts with the conviction that he did not commit any breach of data protection regulations.

It is the responsibility of the healthcare centers to ensure that the information published in the shared medical history, which can be consulted through "My Health", is accurate. . This inaccuracy, consisting in assigning the clinical documents a CIP corresponding to another person, meant that the latter could access the clinical documents of a third person.

The imputed entity published in the BOE several notices of notification regarding a disciplinary procedure initiated against the complainant, in which he was identified through his name and full ID, which contravenes the principle of minimization.

A sanitary center issued a document of derivation so that the laboratory practiced to the patient a determinate test|proof. In this document of derivation data related to the health of the affected person that are not necessary or relevant for the practice of this test|proof are included, what constitutes a breach of minimization principle|beginning of the data.

In elections to members of the works council it is not appropriate to publish the full labor census. In order to check whether the employed persons have the status of electors, the listing of electors that is made from the labor census must be published. This list of voters, which is the subject of publication, must contain the appropriate, relevant and limited data on the purposes for which they are treated.

La publicació a internet sense restricció, així com el seu manteniment, de llistats amb dades personals d'estudiants identificats amb nom, cognoms i DNI complert relatives a la matriculació de l'any 2012, vulnera els principis de l'RGPD. (Minimització i limitació temporal de conservació)