Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

The catchment, the recording and the retransmission live of the football matches constitutes a data processing of personal character that can find habilitation in the consent of the persons affected or in another rule with rank of law, as now the freedom of information (art. 20.1 CE) or the article 8.2.c) of the organic Law 1/1982. The responsible for the treatment will have to give fulfillment to a series of duties as creating the corresponding file, notify it to the authority of control, establish a contract of person in charge of the treatment with the company that intervenes in the management of the system, attend to the rights of the affected persons and inform the affected persons.

The recording of the conversation of a member of the team of government for a citizen in principle requires the previous consent of the affected one. However, it could be legitimated if it is made in order to use it with occasion of the demand of responsibilities. The diffusion, without consent, of this conversation could be legitimated when the recorded information is truthful, given public significance has the object matter of the information or the implicated person, and its diffusion is proportionate to the general interest that justifies.

The diffusion of information, in which particulars figure, through the blog of a municipal group could be fitted out by the freedom of information recognized in the article 20 CE, whenever it is a matter of a truthful information and of public significance that has to prevail about the duty of secret or in general about other rights as the law to the protection of particulars. In the examined case, and for the information of which it is ordered, it cannot be concluded that these circumstances coincide.