The information on which the search is based has been translated by a computer system without human intervention. It may contain errors in vocabulary, syntax or grammar. The translation may also produce mistakes in the searches performed.
707 results were found
RESOLUTION of the procedure of rights protection no. 31/2012, urged by mister XXX against the Regional Government of Lleida
PT 31/2012
The claim of cancellation is loved for not having given answer in the specified period to the effect. As for the background, the engraving of the voice to the session of the negotiating Board in order to write up the corresponding minutes is a treatment subjected to the LOPD, with independence of itself this datum is or not incorporated into a file. It is considered adjusted to law to preserve the engraving until it is written up and the minutes are approved. Applied articles: Art. 2.1, 16 LOPD, 31.2 and 32.2 RLOPD, 15.2.b Law 26/2010
31/10/2012
RESOLUTION of the procedure of rights protection no. 32/2012, urged by mister XXX against the Regional Government of Lleida
PT 32/2012
The claim of cancellation is loved for not having given answer in the specified period to the effect. As for the background, the engraving of the voice to the session of the negotiating Board in order to write up the corresponding minutes is a treatment subjected to the LOPD, with independence of itself this datum is or not incorporated into a file. It is considered adjusted to law to preserve the engraving until it is written up and the minutes are approved. Applied articles: Art. 2.1, 16 LOPD, 31.2 and 32.2 RLOPD, 15.2.b Law 26/2010
31/10/2012
RESOLUTION of the procedure of rights protection no. 33/2012, urged by madam XXX against the Regional Government of Lleida
PT 33/2012
The claim of cancellation is loved for not having given answer in the specified period to the effect. As for the background, the engraving of the voice to the session of the negotiating Board in order to write up the corresponding minutes is a treatment subjected to the LOPD, with independence of itself this datum is or not incorporated into a file. It is considered adjusted to law to preserve the engraving until it is written up and the minutes are approved. Applied articles: Art. 2.1, 16 LOPD, 31.2 and 32.2 RLOPD, 15.2.b Law 26/2010
31/10/2012
RESOLUTION of the procedure of rights protection no. 34/2012, urged by mister XXX against the Regional Government of Lleida
PT 34/2012
The claim of cancellation is loved for not having given answer in the specified period to the effect. As for the background, the engraving of the voice to the session of the negotiating Board in order to write up the corresponding minutes is a treatment subjected to the LOPD, with independence of itself this datum is or not incorporated into a file. It is considered adjusted to law to preserve the engraving until it is written up and the minutes are approved. Applied articles: Art. 2.1, 16 LOPD, 31.2 and 32.2 RLOPD, 15.2.b Law 26/2010
31/10/2012
RESOLUTION of the procedure of rights protection no. 35/2012, urged by madam XXX against the Regional Government of Lleida
PT 35/2012
The claim of cancellation is loved for not having given answer in the specified period to the effect. As for the background, the engraving of the voice to the session of the negotiating Board in order to write up the corresponding minutes is a treatment subjected to the LOPD, with independence of itself this datum is or not incorporated into a file. It is considered adjusted to law to preserve the engraving until it is written up and the minutes are approved. Applied articles: Art. 2.1, 16 LOPD, 31.2 and 32.2 RLOPD, 15.2.b Law 26/2010
31/10/2012
RESOLUTION of the procedure of rights protection no. 36/2012, urged by mister XXX against the Regional Government of Lleida
PT 36/2012
The claim of cancellation is loved for not having given answer in the specified period to the effect. As for the background, the engraving of the voice to the session of the negotiating Board in order to write up the corresponding minutes is a treatment subjected to the LOPD, with independence of itself this datum is or not incorporated into a file. It is considered adjusted to law to preserve the engraving until it is written up and the minutes are approved. Applied articles: Art. 2.1, 16 LOPD, 31.2 and 32.2 RLOPD, 15.2.b Law 26/2010
31/10/2012
RESOLUTION of the procedure of rights protection no. 37/2012, urged by madam XXX against the Regional Government of Lleida
PT 37/2012
The claim of cancellation is loved for not having given answer in the specified period to the effect. As for the background, the engraving of the voice to the session of the negotiating Board in order to write up the corresponding minutes is a treatment subjected to the LOPD, with independence of itself this datum is or not incorporated into a file. It is considered adjusted to law to preserve the engraving until it is written up and the minutes are approved. Applied articles: Art. 2.1, 16 LOPD, 31.2 and 32.2 RLOPD, 15.2.b Law 26/2010
31/10/2012
RESOLUTION of the procedure of rights protection no. 38/2012, urged by madam XXX against the Regional Government of Lleida
PT 38/2012
The claim of cancellation is loved for not having given answer in the specified period to the effect. As for the background, the engraving of the voice to the session of the negotiating Board in order to write up the corresponding minutes is a treatment subjected to the LOPD, with independence of itself this datum is or not incorporated into a file. It is considered adjusted to law to preserve the engraving until it is written up and the minutes are approved. Applied articles: Art. 2.1, 16 LOPD, 31.2 and 32.2 RLOPD, 15.2.b Law 26/2010
31/10/2012
RESOLUTION of the procedure of rights protection no. 39/2012, urged by mister XXX against the Regional Government of Lleida
PT 39/2012
The claim of cancellation is loved for not having given answer in the specified period to the effect. As for the background, the engraving of the voice to the session of the negotiating Board in order to write up the corresponding minutes is a treatment subjected to the LOPD, with independence of itself this datum is or not incorporated into a file. It is considered adjusted to law to preserve the engraving until it is written up and the minutes are approved. Applied articles: Art. 2.1, 16 LOPD, 31.2 and 32.2 RLOPD, 15.2.b Law 26/2010
31/10/2012
RESOLUTION of the procedure of rights protection no. 40/2012, urged by mister XXX against the Regional Government of Lleida
PT 40/2012
The claim of cancellation is loved for not having given answer in the specified period to the effect. As for the background, the engraving of the voice to the session of the negotiating Board in order to write up the corresponding minutes is a treatment subjected to the LOPD, with independence of itself this datum is or not incorporated into a file. It is considered adjusted to law to preserve the engraving until it is written up and the minutes are approved. Applied articles: Art. 2.1, 16 LOPD, 31.2 and 32.2 RLOPD, 15.2.b Law 26/2010
31/10/2012
Total number of pages: 71