Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

This Judgement examines the implications of the Project VISC+ (version March 2015) for the protection of particulars. The new positioning of the project VISC+, which limits the scope of the project to the communication of anonymized data, is appraised positively like this as the possibility of the affected ones exercising l'opt-out for keeping on the fringe of the project VISC+. It is suitable their having been clarified and marked up the purposes for which the data processing (research and evaluation), the typology of addressees (centers accredited as SEARCH and Agents of the integral sanitary system of public utilization of Catalonia), as well as the offered services is justified. It is recommended to make clear and to clarify some questions, among others, the intervention of the CEICs the forecasts related to the destruction of the information, or in the measures to apply in case the applicant breaks the duties that he has assumed.

The claim of rights protection is loved for reasons of form. The claim is rejected regarding the background, to consider pertinent the denial of the cancellation of the police data of the person complaining stored in file. However a series of recommendations to the responsible for file in relation in the way these data are found stored are made. Applied articles: 4, 16, 22, 23 LOPD; 3 31 and 32 RLOPD; 42 and 58 LRJPAC; 41 LRJPCat

The treatments with the concurrence of a legal habilitation, do not require the obtaining of the consent of the affected persons. Applied articles: 11 LOPD; 108 of the legislative Decree 1/2000

The collection of particulars through the form of vehicles immobilization without informative clause harms the law of information. Applied articles: 5.2 LOPD

The access on the part of a town councilor to municipal documentation related to a public worker of the Town Council would be protected by the right of access of the town councilors to the necessary information of the town council to exercise the functions of control of the municipal performance. The revelation of the identity of the worker during two sessions of the Plenum, and afterwards through the publication in internet of the minutes of these sessions, it would be fitted out by legal rules. Applied articles: Art. 164 TRLMRLC, 70.1 LBRL, 10.2 Law 29/2010

Of the performances of research practiced it is not inferred that the information about a public employee that the town councilor communicated to a third Town Council had obtained it in exercise of its charge. Applied articles: Art. 10 LOPD, 9.1 and 11.1.e) Law 19/2014

The access on the part of the person in charge of the treatment (Insurer company in procedure of RPA) is not considered a cession or communication of data. Applied articles: 3 and 12 LOPD; additional disposal 26th RDL 3/2011; 8 and 10 Recommendation 1/2010.

The services of urbanistic inspection are authorized to treat particulars (photographs) without the consent of the person affected, unless the access to the address is required. It is not evident that non authorized staff accessed particulars. Applied articles: 6 LOPD; 91 RLOPD; 200 and 201 legislative Decree 1/2010; 98, 99, 101, 111, 112 and following Decree 64/2014

The valid legislation on the subject of transparency, access to the public information and good government he would fit out the access of a citizen to the transcription of the call made by their relative in the telephone of emergencies 112 in motive of an accident, as a result of which it lost the life, in so far as the particulars that restrain themselves there, related to the person who attended to this call, would be merely identificatives data related with the functioning or the management of the call.