Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

The claim is loved for not having answered the request of access in deadline. About the background, him precise that the law of access of the LOPD includes the information related to the made or foreseen communications but not the information related to the identification of the users that have accessed the clinical history. About this, is mentioned but the recommendation of the GT art. 29 about the convenience to facilitate such information. Applied articles: 15LOPD, 27 and 29 RLOPD and Llei 21/2000 and 41/2002

The claim is rejected because the answer of the Hospital in the sense that did not treat data of the applicant, it would be adjusted to law. Likewise, him precise that the law of access of the LOPD includes the information related to the made or foreseen communications but not the information related to the identification of the users that have accessed the clinical history. About this, is mentioned but the recommendation of the GT art. 29 about the convenience to facilitate such information. Applied articles: 15 LOPD and 27.1 RLOPD; Law 21/2000 and 41/2002

The claim is loved for not having answered the request of access in deadline. About the background, him precise that the law of access of the LOPD includes the information related to the made or foreseen communications but not the information related to the identification of the users that have accessed the clinical history. About this, is mentioned but the recommendation of the GT art. 29 about the convenience to facilitate such information. Applied articles: 15 LOPD and 27.1, 29 RLOPD; Law 21/2000 and 41/2002

The right to the data protection of personal character does not block the access of any citizen to information about a job related to the form of provision (including the type of provisional provision, if it suits), the advertising made when it was offered, the resolution of nomination of the person who occupies it and the date of the taking over.

The right to the protection of personal character data does not block the access of any citizen to information about a job related to the form of provision (including the type of provisional provision, if it is proper), the advertising made when it was offered, the resolution of nomination of the person who occupies it and the date of the taking over.

The right to the protection of personal character data does not block the access of any citizen to information about the jobs of a determinate scale related to the code of the job, place, unit of assignment, if the place is occupied or vacant, if, type of provision, is it for civil servant of career or temporary officer if it exists reserves of square and if the place is subject to amortization. However, the information about the motive of the reservation of square can be disproportionate, once the affectation that can have the revelation of this information for the private life of the affected person has been attended to. The access to the information of the code of the job of the applicant and of its unit of assignment, is part of the right of foreseen access to the article 15 of the LOPD, for which there would not be any impediment to his being able to access it.

The right to the protection of personal character data does not block the access of any citizen to information about a job related to the form of provision (including the type of provisional provision, if it is proper), the advertising made when it was offered, the resolution of nomination of the person who occupies it and the date of the taking over.

The right to the protection of data of character personal it does not prevent the access of any citizen to the bases of a call of selection of staff, in a retail way of the means for which it gave publicized, to the call, to the composition of the organ of selection and to the candidates that they have overcome the process selective with the punctuation obtained.

The publication for edicts, in the BOP as well as in the board of edicts, of a complete resolution that told excessive data, is one constitutive of an offense severe. Applied articles: 4 and 44.3.c LOPD; 58, 59, 60 and 61 LRJPAC; 58 LRJPACat

The law of opposition is loved because the effect was not answered in the foreseen deadline of 10 days. As for the background, the claim is rejected since the opposition to the treatment a head was formulated already had been consummated. Applied articles: Article 6.4 LOPD and 34 and 35 RLOPD