Result of the resolution: Upheld
The claim is loved for not having answered the request of access in deadline. About the background, him precise that the law of access of the LOPD includes the information related to the made or foreseen communications but not the information related to the identification of the users that have accessed the clinical history. About this, is mentioned but the recommendation of the GT art. 29 about the convenience to facilitate such information. Applied articles: 15 LOPD and 27.1, 29 RLOPD; Law 21/2000 and 41/2002