Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

Cession of particulars on the part of the Local Board to an entity who manages determinate social aids. The performances for prescription are filed, and because the accusing person loaned its previous consent for the cession.

Applied articles: Arts. 11, 44.3.k) and 47 LOPD, 10 and 20 Decree 278/2015.

A CEIP a questionnaire to the pupils to elaborate made a sociogram, followed technique to know the social position of each member in a group and that expresses the preferences quantitatively and the rejections, what allows the hard educator actions of cohesion and/or integration, if it falls. The DA23 LOE contains an exception to the general rule of the consent foreseen in the article 6.1 of the LOPD, for which the schools can collect particulars of the pupils -included those of the family and social environment- without the need for consent of the parents/tutors, when they are necessary for the exercise of the educational functions. In the denounced case it is considered that the questionnaire as well as the sociogram are set in the functions of the teaching staff established in article 17 (pupils primary) and 91 of the LOE since these have to watch over the communal life of the group and for the development affective and social of each of its members, motive for which it was not necessary to obtain the consent. With regard to this, the performances are filed.

A CEIP a questionnaire to the pupils to elaborate made a sociogram, followed technique to know the social position of each member in a group and that expresses the preferences quantitatively and the rejections, what allows the hard educator actions of cohesion and/or integration, if it falls. The DA23 LOE contains an exception to the general rule of the consent foreseen in the article 6.1 of the LOPD, for which the schools can collect particulars of the pupils -included those of the family and social environment- without the need for consent of the parents/tutors, when they are necessary for the exercise of the educational functions. In the denounced case it is considered that the questionnaire as well as the sociogram are set in the functions of the teaching staff established in article 17 (pupils primary) and 91 of the LOE since these have to watch over the communal life of the group and for the development affective and social of each of its members, motive for which it was not necessary to obtain the consent. With regard to this, the performances are filed.

A CEIP a questionnaire to the pupils to elaborate made a sociogram, followed technique to know the social position of each member in a group and that expresses the preferences quantitatively and the rejections, what allows the hard educator actions of cohesion and/or integration, if it falls. The DA23 LOE contains an exception to the general rule of the consent foreseen in the article 6.1 of the LOPD, for which the schools can collect particulars of the pupils -included those of the family and social environment- without the need for consent of the parents/tutors, when they are necessary for the exercise of the educational functions. In the denounced case it is considered that the questionnaire as well as the sociogram are set in the functions of the teaching staff established in article 17 (pupils primary) and 91 of the LOE since these have to watch over the communal life of the group and for the development affective and social of each of its members, motive for which it was not necessary to obtain the consent. With regard to this, the performances are filed.

A CEIP a questionnaire to the pupils to elaborate made a sociogram, followed technique to know the social position of each member in a group and that expresses the preferences quantitatively and the rejections, what allows the hard educator actions of cohesion and/or integration, if it falls. The DA23 LOE contains an exception to the general rule of the consent foreseen in the article 6.1 of the LOPD, for which the schools can collect particulars of the pupils -included those of the family and social environment- without the need for consent of the parents/tutors, when they are necessary for the exercise of the educational functions. In the denounced case it is considered that the questionnaire as well as the sociogram are set in the functions of the teaching staff established in article 17 (pupils primary) and 91 of the LOE since these have to watch over the communal life of the group and for the development affective and social of each of its members, motive for which it was not necessary to obtain the consent. With regard to this, the performances are filed.

The claim is loved because answer in deadline was not given to the request of access. The right to know the identity of the files that the data have incorporated into also is part of the law of access.

Applied articles: art. 15 LOPD and 29 RLOPD.

The Town Council elaborated the census of the Tax about vehicles of mechanical traction for the year 2016 with inaccurate data since he associated the data of the here denouncing to a vehicle that had sold in year 2012 and had communicated the sale correctly.

Applied articles: 4.3, 44.3 c) LOPD.

The publication in an official bulletin of an edict of events notification on the occasion of a presumed offense of the Ordinance of Urban Environment, made without having the consent of the headline of the data and without having practiced the notification in the correct address, constitutes an illegitimate cession, since the publication does not remain protected by the art. 59.5 Law 30/1992.

Applied articles: 7.5, 11 and 44.4b) LOPD, 59.2 and 59.5 L30/1992.

The regulations of data protection would not block the access to the contracts of temporary work staff processed with urgent character to cover the places of monitors/nothing and/or auxiliaries of the municipal summer camp, whenever formality of audience has been given to the affected persons and no personal circumstance that can mean a limitation of the access results from it. Except for the data that for its nature require a special protection, and of the identificatives data that are not necessary to attain the pursued purpose.

From the point of view of the right to the protection of personal character data, the system design of alarm described in the Memory does not adapt at the beginning of proportionality and of minimization, for which it would be advisable to implant fallbacks that can give suitable answer to the supposed purpose, without putting the correct fulfillment of the principles and guarantees of the regulations of protection of particulars at risk.