The information on which the search is based has been translated by a computer system without human intervention. It may contain errors in vocabulary, syntax or grammar. The translation may also produce mistakes in the searches performed.
The information on which the search is based has been translated by a computer system without human intervention. It may contain errors in vocabulary, syntax or grammar. The translation may also produce mistakes in the searches performed.
3,654 results were found
PS 51/2010
Starting the collection and data processing of personal character without the authorization of general character disposal of creation of the file constitutes a severe offense. Applied articles: Arts. 3 b), 20 and 44.3 to) of the LOPD
18/03/2011
PS 55/2010
The catchment of images in systems of videovigilància they require to give fulfillment to the law of information through the placing of the preceptive informative posters. Applied articles: 5, 44.2 d) LOPD; 12 Instruction 1/2009.
18/03/2011
PS 46/2010
The catchment of images of the public way that the Forces and Security Corps do not make is not considered legitimate, except when the catchment becomes incidental and strictly unavoidable to attain the purposes of surveillance of buildings or facilities. The catchment of images in systems of videovigilància they require to give fulfillment to the law of information through the placing of the preceptive informative posters. Applied articles: 4, 5, 6, 44.2 d) and 44.3 d) LOPD; 1 HIM 4/1997; 5 and 12 Instruction 1/2009.
10/03/2011
IP 115/2010
Evidence of offense are not observed in the protocol implanted in a hospital for to concede telephonic information to the relatives of the admitted patients at the penitentiary hospitable unit, since in this protocol it is foreseen that the pàcient consents expressly information about its health to being facilitated to a relative and determinate telephone number, so that there would be the exprès consent of the affected person. Applied articles: 7.3 LOPD
04/03/2011
PS 37/2010
Illicit cession of particulars without existence of legal habilitation nor consent of the headline of the data. Applied articles: art 3 and), 11 and 44.4b) LOPD
04/03/2011
PS 39/2010
If the responsible for the file orders third one a service that implies the access to particulars, the contract of treatment person in charge that has to contemplate all of the foreseen extremes has to be formalized to the article 12 of the LOPD. For lack of the mentioned contract, the person in charge of the treatment is responsible, in turn, of a treatment il·licit of particulars. Applied articles: Arts. 6, 12, 45, 44.3.d) LOPD
04/03/2011
PS 43/2010
The Town Council did not formalize a contract of person in charge of the treatment with the adjudicator company of the contract of services that the access to municipal data bases of test implied. He did not establish the necessary safety measures either, nor he kept vigil enough so that the company adopted them adjudicator of the contract, neither did it elaborate correctly nor did it keep the document of security updated. For his part, the adjudicator company exported data without the previous authorization of the responsible for the file, and did not establish the necessary mechanisms of identification and authentication to avoid undue accesses through a web of public access. Applied articles: Art. 10.2 of the Decree 278/1993
04/03/2011
IP 147/2009
Facilitating the access to obrants particulars in an administrative report on the part of whom is a person interested in this report cannot be considered like an illicit cession of data in third one, since the art. 35.a) of the Law 30/1992 he fits out this access. Applied articles: art. 11 LOPD and 35 to) Law 30/1992
04/03/2011
PT 1/2011
The claim of protection is rejected referring to the law of access, since the information of the clinical history that was claimed, it does not find incorporated into the files of the responsible. Applied articles: 15, 18 LOPD; 27, 28 and 29 RLOPD and 4, 14, 15, 18 Law 41/2002
04/03/2011
CNS 5/2011
The exhibition for the Town Councils of the definite lists of juries constitutes a cession of particulars (art. 3 and) of the LOPD), and it finds subjected to the regime of cessions of the article 11 of the LOPD. There is ex. habilitation art. 11 of the LOPD, exclusively to set forth publicly the data that are suitable, pertinent and non excessive in application of the principles of quality and of purpose (art.4 of the LOPD), for the fulfillment of the purpose of the exhibition. Specifically, the habilitation legitimates the communication or public exhibition of name and surnames of the juries, ordered with the corresponding number and town, without the habilitation being able to be drawn to the data set which the LOREG foresees to treat in the context of the census of voters, even to the other necessary data to elaborate the lists of juries. This, without harm that in exceptional suppositions it is pertinent to limit the diffusion of particulars, in a justified way.
25/02/2011
Total number of pages: 366