Denial of the law of access not to have the requested data.

The present protection of rights is rejected because the law of access does not reach to know the identity of the staff that, pèro in more, has accessed the HC in this case when the complaining person exercised the right to the traceability of its clinical history in relation to two accesses that had been produced in year 2014, the responsible organ any more did not have the requested data and this because the minimum duty to preserve the data of the register of accesses is 2 years and in the case that it occupies for us already had passed abundantly.