Result of the resolution: Upheld
The untimeliness of the City Council's response to the applicant's request, which is described as an exercise of the right of opposition, is declared untimely, given that the claimant's intention is not to suppress his data, but these do not appear in the two acts of a selective process that appear published in the municipal web. No pronouncement is made on the merits, given that the right of opposition of the claimant has finally been addressed, within the procedure prior to art. 37.3 of the LOPDGDD.