The opposition to the treatment does not proceed because it proceeds to maintain the particulars in the controversial juridical reports.

It proceeds to love the claim upward of opposition for reasons formal (lack of answer to the request in deadline), and to reject it as for the background, since in the request of opposition a motive set up and legitimate related to a situation is not proved personal concrete, and the adduced motive, related to a presumed illicitness of the treatment, it is not such, since it has been an object of some performances of research to the Authority that they have finished with resolution of archive, with regard to the consideration that the information referring to the here claimant who appears in the juridical shapeless related ones –and that fundamentally it is about the relation of the successive writings that the here claimant would have kept on presenting in front of the Town Council during several months of year 2017- it would form part of the expression of the criterion juridical of the consistent municipal lawyer on setting the actions of contestation in a context of the here complaining. Moreover, the opposition refers to a data processing already made (they constitute the juridical foundation of the resolutions of the appeals), what for yes same would already prevent upward the feasibility here exercised.