Result of the resolution: Partially upheld
the claim is loved for formal reasons, since the sending of the request of access to an organ different of the competent one to solve it does not justify the delay in its answer. As for the background, the right of access to documentation is recognized that it constitutes the minimum contents of a clinical history, and the claim is rejected as for the request of access to general information related to the supplied drugs and to a report of the head of security and computer science, news of the eventual modifications of the clinical history, not to constitute the contents typical of a clinical history, or not to be part of its at the minimum compulsory contents.