the discourtesy of a law I ARCO it does not mean necessarily that an offense of the LOPD has been committed.

Although the Town Council neglected the request of cancellation formulated by the denouncer, due to not having given answer in the legally foreseen deadline, this in yes same does not constitute an offense of the LOPD. And in so far as the denial of the cancellation abides by law for the fact that the town council treats the data necessary for the provision of determinate public services, evidence that it lead to considering that the silence or aquietament of the Town Council in the face of the request of cancellation has prevented or hindered is not observed the exercise of the law of cancellation. Equally, the orders of the treatment made by the Town Council in favor of several entities for the provision of these services he authorizes them to treat data of the denouncer, without its consent being necessary.