A possible option to guarantee the rights of the affected ones when the consultation|consulting|surgery of documents in power of the public administrations it|he|she affects in third it|he|she could|might be to include a clause in the form of request in which the applicant declares that the rest|subtraction of affected they have accessed to|in this information and that have not opposed to it or, if it suits, if they have opposed to it. The article|item 28.2 of the LPAC could|might legitimate the consultation|consulting|surgery for the administration acting as tributary data in being able or elaborated by the tributary administration, which it|he would make redig the consent of the affected one unnecessary. The consultation|consulting|surgery but of documents or tributary data brought previously by the person concerned he|she|it would require of its|his|her|their express consent, in attention in the articles|items 28.3 of the LPAC and 95.1.k) of the LGT. The check of the veracity of the data stated by the applicants of social benefits on the part of the competent administrations would not require the consent of the persons affected, whenever it|he|she adapts to the one established in the DF7a of the Law 2/2014.