Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

In this case it can be considered that determinate particulars about the headline of the license of opening of some premises of restoration do not find proteges for the regulations of data protection, for application of the article 2.3 of the RLOPD, and therefore the legitimacy of the communication of these data to an Entity of management of author's copyright has to be analyzed from other rules. Even though the Law of copyright does not concede specifically a capacity or authority inspector, of research or of auditing to the entities of management and to its representatives, yes he attributes them the "management of the author's copyright", with regard to which it cannot be discarded that the representative of the Entity has certainly a legitimate and direct interest, in the terms that the article 37.3 of Law 30/1992 requires, of juridical regime of the public administrations and of the common administrative procedure, in order to access the information that he requests.

Particulars contained in an administrative report are filed by lack of evidence which they allow to infer that a Town Council handed over illicitly to third one. Applied articles: 11 LOPD

According to the nature of the treatment, the claimed entity can offer a fallback of consultation of the file. The law of access entails the right to obtain copies from the object documentation of treatment. However, its awarding can exclude those data from personal character that they can affect to the fundamental right to the protection of data of personal character of third, which will be able to be dissociated by the claimed entity. Applied articles: 15 LOPD; 23, 25 to 30 RLOPD; 53 L 26/10; 30, 100, 117 L14/10; 45 L 12/07;13 L21/00

The treatment of particulars on the part of a town council without conceding the information that foresees the article 5.4 of the LOPD when the data have not been collected of the person concerned, he declares constitutive of severe offense. Likewise a municipal society is stated that the town council has treated particulars of il·licita way since he has ordered the rendering of services, that it implies the access and data processing contained in the files of the town council without formalizing the corresponding contract of treatment person in charge in a previous way. Applied articles: Articles 5.4, 12, 44.2.d), 44.2.a) and 44.3.I) of the LOPD,

The access to given of personal character on account of third, for the realization of determinate treatments, without observing the formal duties that article 12 establishes LOPD, it is constitutive of an offense slight. Applied articles: 12 and 44.2 d) of the LOPD.

the performances by lack of rational evidence which they allow to infer that a sanitary center yielded unduly file data of health of the denouncer in the Court on duty. There is evidence neither that the mentioned center had blocked to the affected person the access to this documentation, in the one not to be evident that had requested the access to itself. Applied articles: Arts. 24.2 CE, 137.1 Law 30/92 and 355 LECrim

The notification made in the newspaper or official bulletin when the personal notification has not been able to be practiced after the preceptive attempts, is a communication of data that the consent of the person affected for ordering does not require from legal habilitation applied Articles: Art. 11 LOPD and 59 Law 30/1992

The access on the part of the services of a Town Council to the contents of an envelope directed to a person town councilor that it is not part of the team of municipal government, it constitutes an illicit treatment, to harm the principle of consent. Applied articles: Art. 44.3.d) and 6 LOPD and 38 Law 30/1992