Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

The claim of cancellation is loved for not having given answer in the specified period to the effect. As for the background, the engraving of the voice to the session of the negotiating Board in order to write up the corresponding minutes is a treatment subjected to the LOPD, with independence of itself this datum is or not incorporated into a file. It is considered adjusted to law to preserve the engraving until it is written up and the minutes are approved. Applied articles: Art. 2.1, 16 LOPD, 31.2 and 32.2 RLOPD, 15.2.b Law 26/2010

The claim of cancellation is loved for not having given answer in the specified period to the effect. As for the background, the engraving of the voice to the session of the negotiating Board in order to write up the corresponding minutes is a treatment subjected to the LOPD, with independence of itself this datum is or not incorporated into a file. It is considered adjusted to law to preserve the engraving until it is written up and the minutes are approved. Applied articles: Art. 2.1, 16 LOPD, 31.2 and 32.2 RLOPD, 15.2.b Law 26/2010

The claim of cancellation is loved for not having given answer in the specified period to the effect. As for the background, the engraving of the voice to the session of the negotiating Board in order to write up the corresponding minutes is a treatment subjected to the LOPD, with independence of itself this datum is or not incorporated into a file. It is considered adjusted to law to preserve the engraving until it is written up and the minutes are approved. Applied articles: Art. 2.1, 16 LOPD, 31.2 and 32.2 RLOPD, 15.2.b Law 26/2010

The claim of cancellation is loved for not having given answer in the specified period to the effect. As for the background, the engraving of the voice to the session of the negotiating Board in order to write up the corresponding minutes is a treatment subjected to the LOPD, with independence of itself this datum is or not incorporated into a file. It is considered adjusted to law to preserve the engraving until it is written up and the minutes are approved. Applied articles: Art. 2.1, 16 LOPD, 31.2 and 32.2 RLOPD, 15.2.b Law 26/2010

The claim of cancellation is loved for not having given answer in the specified period to the effect. As for the background, the engraving of the voice to the session of the negotiating Board in order to write up the corresponding minutes is a treatment subjected to the LOPD, with independence of itself this datum is or not incorporated into a file. It is considered adjusted to law to preserve the engraving until it is written up and the minutes are approved. Applied articles: Art. 2.1, 16 LOPD, 31.2 and 32.2 RLOPD, 15.2.b Law 26/2010

The claim of cancellation is loved for not having given answer in the specified period to the effect. As for the background, the engraving of the voice to the session of the negotiating Board in order to write up the corresponding minutes is a treatment subjected to the LOPD, with independence of itself this datum is or not incorporated into a file. It is considered adjusted to law to preserve the engraving until it is written up and the minutes are approved. Applied articles: Art. 2.1, 16 LOPD, 31.2 and 32.2 RLOPD, 15.2.b Law 26/2010

A document shown in front of the Town Council is brought as a documentary evidence for judicial procedure. The access to this document allowed by the Town Council would be in a judicial procedure justified in the legitimate and direct interest of the worker of the Town Council in order to exercise its law of defense against the accusing person under protection of the legal habilitation contained 37 LRJPAC in the article. Applied articles: Article 11 LOPD and 37 Law 30/1992.

The communication of data made at the Forces and Security Corps in the context of the formulation of a complaint, in order to facilitate the identification of the author of the denounced fact, would be a performance according to the given LOPD the existence of legal habilitation. Applied articles: Articles11 and 22 LOPD; 259, 262 and 267 LECr

The law of information prevails about the right to the protection of personal character data when the requirements of veracity and significance meet, at the terms that the doctrine of the Constitutional Court points out. The archive in relation to the eventual cession of the image of the accusing person in third one, with regard to the principles of personality of the sanctions and of presumption of innocence, proceeds when the authorship of the denounced facts cannot be determined. Applied articles: 20 and 24 of the CE; 11 and 43 of the LOPD; 137 of the Law 30/1992.

The communication of particulars to a person who has been hired by the responsible to carry out tasks for countable advice can be considered an access on account of third, in so far as the treatment of these data is necessary for the provision of this service, although it is necessary that a contract of person in charge of the treatment has been formalized.