Resolutions, opinions and reports search tool

The Town Council can use the data of the Census of inhabitants in exercise of the municipal competences and as an instrument of communication with the neighbors, to send a related card to the motion of censure and to the lines of performance of the new municipal government.

Claim brought up as a law of cancellation that is taken back to the right of opposition to fit more to the formulated pretension, related to the depublication of lists of an already finished selective process. The claim of protection estimates the request upward from a formal optics for not having solved in the deadline of 10 days. The Town Council has given answer on having on having knowledge of the claim, but has been detected that a document, motive by which the depublication is required to the Town Council, can still be accessed.

Applied articles: 6.4 LOPD, 35 RLOPD.

The claim is loved upward from access of the complaining person to the clinical history of its deceased father for formal reasons, since the hospital did not facilitate it in the specified period to the effect. With posteriority to the claim the Hospital facilitated the requested access, in spite of that in an extemporaneous way, motive for which it is not necessary to require that it becomes effective.

Applied articles: 15 LOPD; 27, 28 and 29 RLOPD; 13 Law 21/2000; 18 Law 41/2002.

The present claim is loved because the responsible organ has not accredited to have given answer to the request of access of the person claiming, motive for which it is required so that he makes him effective. For the case that does not have this information that is an object of the law of access, equally this circumstance will have to communicate it to the complaining person, and for the case that the access has already been made effective, will have to prove it in the face of the Authority.

Applied articles: 15 LOPD, 29 RLOPD.

The consent of the persons affected for treating its data when they retire for the exercise of functions of the AAPP in the area of its competences is not necessary. The archive is appropriate when the responsible is titular of a file that gives coverage to the object treatment of complaint. The archive is also appropriate when the cession or communication of data is fitted out by a rule with rank of Law. In the last one, when evidence about the incorrect use of the data is not brought nor it is specified what such mistake would have consisted of, the archive also proceeds.

Applied articles: 4, 6, 11 and 21 of the LOPD; 25 and 106 of the Law 7/1985; 201 of the legislative Decree 1/2010; 12 of the Law 10/1994; 69 of the Law 30/1992; 7 RDL 2/2004

The consent of the persons affected for treating its data when they retire for the exercise of functions of the AAPP in the area of its competences is not necessary. The archive is appropriate when the responsible is titular of a file that gives coverage to the object treatment of complaint. The archive is also appropriate when the cession or communication of data is fitted out by a rule with rank of Law. In the last one, when evidence about the incorrect use of the data is not brought nor it is specified what such mistake would have consisted of, the archive also proceeds.

Applied articles: 4, 6, 11 and 21 of the LOPD; 25 and 106 of the Law 7/1985; 201 of the legislative Decree 1/2010; 12 of the Law 10/1994; 69 of the Law 30/1992; 7 RDL 2/2004

When the images picked up by the system of videovigilància are not stored, the creation of a file is not necessary. The prescription of the offense provokes the extinction of the responsibility that could derive from the infractor behavior.

Applied articles: 9 Instruction 1/2009; 5, 9, 15, 44.2.c, 44.3.a, 44.3.k and 47 LOPD.

Not to implement the suitable and necessary safety measures to avoid undue accesses, is constitutive of a severe offense. Two offenses of this nature would have been committed, one related to the safety measure of identification and authentication of the users; and another due to not avoiding the non authorized access to data of health of third.

Applied articles: 44.3.i) and 46 of the LOPD; 24 of the LLei 32/2010.

The catchment of data especially proteges it is legitimate when the treatment is accessory. The archive is appropriate when there is not evidence that the images picked up by the cameras of videovigilància have been used with a purpose different to the one stated (security), as the identification of the persons who go to the union offices, or the work control of the employee persons. In the case of buildings, an informative poster has to be installed in each of the accesses to the vidoevigilada area and, if, another poster in a space of main access of the plant that counts on cameras, is in plants divided.

Applied articles: 5 and 12 of the Instruction 1/2009.

Treating the images picked up by the cameras with until of work control and disciplinary, without the consent of the affected persons nor the concurrence of a legal habilitation, constitutive of an offense severe is. Picking up images of the public way beyond what is indispensable to attain the purpose of pursued surveillance; like this as preserving the images more time of what it works out for the period of conservation one superior to what works out necessary does not have to be necessary to fulfill the purpose of surveillance for which the data have been collected or recorded, it is constitutive of a severe offense. Not to place informative posters in each of the accesses to the dependences and not to provide information about the rest of foreseen points in the article 5.1 of the LOPD through forms, web or electronic headquarters to the affected persons, is constitutive of a slight offense.

Applied articles: 4, 5, 6, 44.3.b, 44.3.c, 44.2.c LOPD; 5, 8, 12 of the Instruction 1/2009.