Result of the resolution: Upheld
The claim is loved, on the one hand for formal reasons, because the town council demanded from the applicant of access to bring the consent of the other progenitor, which was not exigible, without harm of giving this other progenitor audience. As for the background, also the estimation proceeds because the applicant had the right to accessing the data of census of its minor son, even if with posteriority in the request the casualty of that census had been processed as new high in that address (access in historical of the census).