Result of the resolution: Warning
SCT, as a responsible for the treatment, did not keep vigil because the datum of the address|home used by the ATC for the practice of the notification of the provision of constraint to the person sanctioned by a driving offense, it was the pertinent one, that it|he|she would be the one that figures in the Register|Record of vehicles (art. 90 of the RDL 6/2015, of 30 October), and that to|in such effects it|he|she communicated the affected person.