Result of the resolution: Set aside/dismissed
The whistleblower suspected that a nurse who is his neighbour would have entered his clinical history. He based his suspicions on insults that the person denouncing him offered him the husband of the so-called nurse. The list of accesses provided by the reported entity states that the nurse did not access her clinical history and that all accesses had been made by doctors and were duly justified. The "insults" that the complainant claimed the nurse's husband did not reflect any particular health data.