The expedition of the steering wheel without the consent of the affected person justifies herself in the fact that the treatment was necessary to the attributed to the Town Council and that this had delegated in the .

The Town Council had delegated the competences|competitions of management|formality and collection|takings of a municipal tax in the ORGT.
The accusing person lodged a resource|appeal of replacement|repeat against the liquidation of the tax.
The ORGT asked the Town Council for the expedition of the padronal steering wheel of the accusing person, which it|he|she had as a purpose to check out if the requirements were fulfilled that gave the right to the exemption of the tax for transmission of the house|housing within the framework of a resource|appeal of replacement|repeat shown|presented by the accusing person. The juridical basis that legitimates this activity of treatment is not the consent of the affected person, but the treatment is necessary to exercise|exert the competences|competitions attributed to the Town Council and that he|she has delegated in the ORGT.

Later, the accusing person lodged an administrative contentious resource|appeal against the resolution of the ORGT and within the framework of the judicial procedure the administrative report was brought that contained the padronal steering wheel. The juridical basis that protects this treatment is that the treatment is necessary to fulfill a legal duty applicable to the responsible for the treatment.