Result of the resolution: Set aside/dismissed
Aside from the person's manifestations, no other element is available to corroborate that a third person accessed the data of the padron of the now complainant. It is admitted that, on the other hand, the City Council denies that this has happened. Nor can it be ruled out that, as the accused entity points out, it was a third person or a consultation of a public register, the source of the information. Consequently, the procedure should be shelved because it is not possible to prove that the City Council has allowed undue access to the data of the complainant's sponsor.