Presumed communication of data of the person who a complaint formulated to the denounced person.

The complaint is filed not to exist evidence enough that allows to impute the communication of data denounced and drowned by the town council. The one denounced, if the complaint derived in a procedure (previous ponderation among the rights and affected interests), has evidence about the town council not informing the denouncer about the possible communication of its data accredited, but the responsibility for these facts would have become extinct by prescription.