Result of the resolution: Upheld
The claim is loved by lack of answer of the responsible for the file, without a valid justificatory cause that the annotation to he chronicles it hospital had made it a doctor ascribed organically to a center dependent on another entity. As for the background, however, the prevalence of the medical criterion is advised to appraise and to maintain an annotation, and of the legal duty of conservation of this to be part of he chronicles it hospital. Applied articles: Art. 16.1 LOPD, 25.2, 32., 32.2 and 33.1 RLOPD, 15.2 and 17.1 Law 41/2002, 12.4 and 12.6 Law 21/2000